What 100K Twitter Followers Gets You
Everyone always seems fascinated with Twitter follower counts. Friend Beth Kanter was recently added to the official Twitter recommended list, which in turn added more than 100,000 new followers to her account. We decided to see what kind of impact the new following brought with it.
We did this by retweeting a link to the above photo featuring her and fellow BlogPotomac Keynote Shel Israel. Before Beth’s tweet, the photo had approximately 140 views. After she tweeted it, the photo garnered another 260 views, ten of which you could assume came from prior tweets and links.
So unofficially, Beth’s then 120,000 followers produced a click through rate of 0.2 percent. Now on my feed of 7,500 followers a popular photo like the above if it’s not retweeted (as this one was when I dropped it) usually gets about 50 click throughs, or approximately 0.7 percent. In this case if you include RTs, I accounted for roughly 150 views or 2 percent (sounds like email click throughs).
So the lessons learned? Generally speaking, with more casual followers you lose engagement and influence power.
While the actual number of click throughs increased with numbers. if the following isn’t organically or naturally cultivated then people care much less about your tweets, and are not as likely to click through. Influence wanes without relationships. Social media is still relational. It’s better to cultivate a rabid community than a massive following.
I’ve seen this same phenomena on large client Twitter accounts as well as heard it from other folks with 100k Twitter followings. Bigger is not necessarily better.
P.S. See Beth’s post on how she came to be listed, and the impact it’s had on her.
Popularity: 64% [?]
Tags: @kanter, Beth Kanter, follower, influence, recommended list, shel israel, twitter
This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009 at 6:42 am and is filed under social media. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
82 Responses to “What 100K Twitter Followers Gets You”
Comments
Social Media Mentions
-
RT: @heidiotway Do you really want 100,000 followers on Twitter? [link to post] -
@wheresPAUL similar but diff post + insights from @geoffliving & @kanter: What 100K Twitter Followers Gets You [link to post] #nptech -
[twitter] What 100K Twitter Followers Gets You | Geoff Livingston’s Blog [link to post] -
RT @KateDickman: GREAT article for those who think the more followers they have, the better. [link to post] -
RT @akhilak Great ex of why social media still based on relationships. RT @TargetStars What 100K Followers Gets You [link to post] -
Great example of why social media still based on relationships. RT @TargetStars: What 100K Twitter Followers Gets You [link to post] -
@akhilak Thanks for the RT. It’s been awhile! How are you? Hope all is well. -
A case study on followers from the Twitter “recommended” list [link to post] (ht @KateDickman via @wherespaul) -
@erictpeterson answer to your @twitalyzer question part 1 http://bit.ly/U89o6 and part 2 [link to post] ur thoughts? -
Relationships, people! How did I miss this? @geoffliving on what 100K twitter followers gets you: [link to post] -
RT @askdebra: Relationships, people! How did I miss this? @geoffliving on what 100K twitter followers gets you: [link to post] -
Here’s What 100K ‘Twitter Followers’ Gets You [link to post] http://friendfeed.com/e/55056928-5fbc-4509-baed-505b4fc7e256 -
What 100K Twitter Followers Gets you [link to post] Great study by @geoffliving and @kanter -
@GeoffLiving re-reading “What will 100K Twitter Followers get you?” [link to post]
Leave a Reply
Twitter Comment
Do you really want 100,000 followers on Twitter? [link to post]
– Posted using Chat Catcher