Attack of the Fried Chicken Freaks

2887427240_f52c12c69d.jpg

Sitting on a panel about public failure this past week, the conversation revolved around negative comments and how to handle them online (Image by thebittenword.com). After five years on the internet as an opinionated blogger, I’ve learned a thing or two about negative attacks, comments and behavior from online communities. Heck, I’ve even been lambasted by friends for pointing out that fried chicken causes obesity, which in turn has been scientifically linked to breast cancer.

So what do you do when the fried chicken freaks attack in defense of their beloved fattening dish? This was laughable so I will use it as an example. Often, I don’t find the more malicious attacks to be humorous, though. And I will discuss those in a general fashion.

There are aspects of online confrontations that require reputation management, but there’s also an element of personal survival, too. It’s important to remember you’re the only one who has to live with yourself, and validation through others or the popular crowd does not necessarily equate to living in one’s skin.

Discussing Negative Criticism

It’s important to engage your critics directly. In fact, in my opinion, this is why BP’s social media during the Deep Horizon crisis has failed (see NPR story). You can’t run away from public criticism by simply delivering messages. When the fried chicken thing hit two weeks ago, I discussed this with my critic Jason Falls, and then his many fans, on Twitter.

When you find a conclusion — either agreed upon or in this case disagreement — end the conversation amiably. Meaning, don’t get into heated debates. I was not going to sway Jason and his friends, and the conversation was not worth a real throw-down discussion. So I took my licks and was quiet.

Public Attacks

Unfortunately, people will say things to you online that they would never say to your face. When someone attacks me online either publicly or on one of my social media properties and it revolves around an issue, I publicly address it. Usually, the person’s rhetorical tone drops.

If the rhetoric continues, I call out the personal attack. There’s no need to get personal, so bring it back to the issue. If the nastiness ensues, I consider the person a troll (even for one bad day) and disengage. If it’s on my social media properties, I give them a final warning, and then if it continues, they are escorted to the virtual door.

In the case of the nasty pot shot, particularly those that occur in the third person, I usually ignore them. In my opinion, that’s trollish behavior, and reflects on their character.

Gossip

Sunset Silhouette Waikiki Beach

Our culture and its events breed egos and gossip like water encourages bacteria. Sometimes gossip comes back to you, and it’s mean-spirited, cruel and frankly, just flat out wrong. When a vicious untrue rumor hits, unless it has become public, turn the other cheek.

Ultimately, on a personal level it’s none of your business, and has much more to do with the gossiper’s character than you. It’s important to tell your source your perception of the facts, thank them for making you aware of the rumor, but also to ask them not to bring it up again. Why should you suffer at the hands of someone else’s tongue?

Factual Rumors

There’s gossip and then there are rumors based in fact. If the rumor is even somewhat true, well then, I suggest owning the factual wrong — either privately or publicly — as a reputation management precursor. But not only that, don’t just say you’re sorry, correct the wrong, address it so you can honestly say that it won’t happen again.

An effective apology means something. An empty one doesn’t. I remember in one case of really poor behavior, someone acknowledged general wrong doing, but said they saw no value in looking at the past. The outcome was not positive.

Hurt

Anyone who tells you this stuff doesn’t hurt is lying, in my opinion. It hurts a lot sometimes. Sometimes there’s so much negativity, or it hits me in just the right place, I want to die inside. I want to fight back (two a-holes don’t make a situation better), or worse, I just want to tear down my online profiles and never come back. I feel beaten down.

But I’ve learned that none of these reactions help the situation. The internet just accelerates normal brick and mortar life, and no matter what, I will encounter the same situations again later on.

What’s important is having compassion for one’s self, and doing what’s necessary to privately heal. Then come back. In the interim, remain professional and as even-keeled as possible, and if there’s nothing to add positively to the situation, quiet silence is an appropriate reaction.

In the end, people are beautiful. When we navigate these difficulties and continue to bring compassion to bear online and in our real lives, the end result is a better world. In life you fall down and get scars. But you do get back up and the pain fades quickly. So smile and be grateful for all of the positive things in your life. The sun still shines.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • http://socialmediaexplorer.com Jason Falls

    Well said, my friend. Glad our virtual scuffles can lead to so much good. Carry on.

  • http://www.bethkanter.org Beth Kanter

    Thanks for this post – good advice! Especially the last line – “So smile and be grateful for all of the positive things in your life. The sun still shines.” Happy Father’s Day!

  • http://drewsherbshop.com Myrna

    Geoff, lovely article. I felt every word! :)

  • http://www.wtflungcancer.com Jennifer Windrum

    The wonderful thing about all of this – the scuffles, the controversy, the scars – is PASSION! Look at all the good passion on both sides can bring. What’s even better, is the ability to come to some sort of mutual understanding—not always agreement, but understanding. It takes true “real” people to be able to reach this point. We don’t further ourselves or the many things we feel so passionately about if we don’t speak up —but, more importantly, be honest with ourselves and others when we ARE incorrect. I’m not saying this in regard to this particular situation, but in general. I still can’t figure out why telling the truth is do damn hard. We all have opinions. Sometimes the true facts can be hard to decipher. Either way, where would we be without this discourse? Without the PASSION??? Happy Father’s Day!!!

  • http://www.citizeneffect.org Dan Morrison

    Good stuff my friend. Sometimes it is hard to stay above the fray and you succumb to the heat of the moment, especially when you have a witty zinger. We all remember the Seinfeld “Jerk store” episode (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpNPw4H6_tU). But in the end, take a deep breath, wait and rethink the response. 90% of the time, you delete it and forget about it… the other 10% it is so witty you accidentally hit send and follow up with an “I’m so sorry email.”

  • Deanna McNeil

    Thanks for not giving in to those moments of feeling beaten down!

  • Ja-Nae

    First off, the fried chicken is making me hungry! But hunger aside, nice post Geoff. You make some great points. I believe that negative criticism does hurt, however, it was Maria Callas who remarked, “When my enemies stop hissing, I shall know I’m slipping.” Though it doesn’t pertain directly to BP, it is a firm reminder that people talk. If you are going to listen to the positive comments, then it is also your obligation to listen to the negative ones as well. There many be truths hidden within them.

    Thanks again, Geoff.

  • http://geofflivingston.com Geoff Livingston

    @Jason: Glad we get the bigger picture. You’re a great friend.

    @Jennifer: LOL< ironically, it’s much easier to tell the truth. You don’t have to remember what you said.

    @Ja-Nae: The bigger you get the more BS comes your way, much of it unfounded, much of it based in other people’s egos. I hope you get a chance to find that out.

  • Ja-Nae

    Geoff, I completely agree. Almost all of it is based on the ego: good and bad. I just believe that if a person or a company is going to listen to what others have to say, then they have to listen to all of it and not have selective hearing. :-)

  • http://geofflivingston.com Geoff Livingston

    Ja-Nae: Have to be honest. Don’t see that as true. I don’t need to listen to anyone. I choose to listen as a commitment to a conversation, and when I see something that seems off, I can also choose to ignore it. Sometimes I pay a price for that, often I don’t.

  • Ja-Nae

    Geoff, I feel like we are saying similar things but in different ways.

    I feel that you can listen to negative and positive feedback and then do what you like with it, on both sides of the coin. Almost a “Take what you like and leave the rest..” mentality.

    The point I was trying to make earlier (pre-coffee, mind you) was that if you believe the positive feedback, then why not believe the negative as well? Both are fuel by someone’s ego. The only difference is the personal agenda that is usually tied to each comment.

    I hope that makes more sense. :-)