A recent infographic published on a Forbes blog ranks the top 20 Fortune 100 CMOs based on social scoring. The graphic poses an interesting question: Should CMOs be judged by their individual social media prowess?
The methodology for the social scores released in the infographic was not released, and there was an incredibly wide disparity between follower counts and placement in the Top 20. It’s hard to consider the scores valid because we don’t know the criteria used for the algorithm.
One would hope Forbes would insist authors provide information sources and research criteria, even when it’s published under the guise of a blog. More on this tomorrow. Today let’s address the question of CMOs and social media scores.
Clearly influencers have become an important part of marketing.
The first group of people to tell you that is the influencer/social media community. That’s because we as a group overvalue ourselves.
As someone who builds integrated marketing strategies that include a wide variety of tactics — including traditional advertising, PR, direct and additional social media in the sense of communities talking about common ideas, content and topics of interest — I would not make the mistake of judging a CMO based on their strength or weakness in one singular tactical tool set. Particularly as measured by any score weighing the CMOs’ public use of social media.
CMOs Manage Disciplines and Practitioners
A CMO’s job by its very nature dictates that they master the strategic deployment of all disciplines and tactics to achieve end results. I did like how the Forbes article noted:
“Frank Shaw, Microsoft’s Corporate Vice President, Corporate Communications explains the importance of personal use of social – this way, ‘If we as communicators are going to use these new channels, we have to use them personally, understand the differences in tone, the idiosyncrasies, strengths and weaknesses each offer.'”
And in five years, CMOS should also understand immersive media experiences that transcend online and physical environments. Specifically how the Internet pervades and is used throughout our physical world. CMOs will need to comprehend how big data creates behavioral media customized to the one or the few.
A CMO’s job is not to be a social media expert.
Rather they should know how these media forms can be used. For example, how relationships and grassroots influence work in communities or how social media and can be integrated into a larger marketing campaign.
Frankly, when it comes to actual participation most CMOS simply hire a community manager, or in larger organizations, build out a digital team that includes social.
The Nihilistic Influencer Conversation
To be so consistently focused on the value of being an influencer shows a level of self infatuation as a group that makes me wonder whether the conversation is completely nihilistic. This makes the individual influencer conversation irrelevant to a CMO who is concerned with the aggregate.
Currying favor from “influential people” is still a highly subjective art that walks between business development brilliance and media relations savoir faire. I have yet to see a social scoring system that matches what happens in the marketplace.
We should move the conversation beyond individual blogger power conversations, and get into wider more important topics about how influence can impact brands, communities and social networks. For example:
- How do influencers integrate into a larger marketing effort that delivers an effective profitability plan for a company?
- Influencer or media or community member, which matters most, why or why not? How do they work together in supporting each other in the online information ecosystem?
- What role should influencers play in societal change, good and bad?
This is the big picture that matters. This is what we as marketing strategists, a society, governmental bodies, and nonprofits need to understand about social networks, influence, and actions. That kind of influence conversation is productive and worthwhile, in my opinion.
What do you think?