Archive for the ‘Cause’ Category

Post Mortem: Examining CitizenGulf

Posted on: August 31st, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 3 Comments

scaled500.png

Per last week’s post, the CitizenGulf Day of Action some good numbers and created a mindful way for people to take action in the face of the oil spill. As the entire process was largely open sourced, I’d like to share my analysis of the marketing experience, too. It is my hope that by sharing this information, other individuals and non-profits that are considering developing events can garner best practices for their own efforts.

The value of participating as a volunteer in #CitizenGulf was threefold:

1) Provide a mindful way for people to respond to BP and the Obama Administration’s collective mishandling of the situation
2) Help fishing families get on their feet and perhaps find a new future via education
3) The experience garnered running a series of concurrent national meet-ups

We met the first two objectives fairly well. By my estimate, we got at least 1000 people to take actions online or in person, and helped at least eight kids get into the After School Assembly program with $10,000 in funds raised (final tallies from Citizen Effect pending).

There are a couple of general themes that are important to note. Initially, we had larger fundraising expectations, but several challenges arose — namely BP’s role in and responsibility for the disaster, and timing — that made it clear this wasn’t going to happen as early as August 4th.

The Issue: As angry as people were, the oil spill was an issue they felt BP should handle, and if not, then the Obama Administration. It was very hard getting people to act and support this issue, especially with the dying media attention, and BP claims that the oil was gone.

Others felt the fishermen didn’t deserve a break. In the Gulf, one event organizer was encouraged not to have an event because it would hurt local tourism business. Add in the horrible disaster that occurred in Pakistan, and this effort became a very tough sell. This effort moved to become much more of an education initiative for the public.

Timing: We put the events together, from beginning to end in five weeks and two days. The actual events opened on August 1, with a 24 day ramp. This shows tremendous activism can occur using social tools in a quick timeline, if need warrants.

In this case with the oil spill rapidly leaving the national media and the minds of U.S. citizens and with the anniversary of Hurricane Katrina on August 28th, we felt that the window of action was a limited one.

Timing also worked against us. August is a slow month, and organizers only had weeks to get the word out. I am sure we lost some cities because of this. It also put enormous strain on the national effort. Mistakes happened as a result. I believe in the cause enough to do this and have no regrets, but I will think three times before doing a series of meet-ups with so little time. Six months would be ideal.

Overall It Was a Success

WeekOf.jpg
Twitter Activity the Week of CitizenGulf Events

In my mind, the effort was a success, primarily because enough local leaders really ran with this, and so many people took action. The effort succeeded because most of us involved in organizing events kept going no matter what. People showed their true characters, and the success of CitizenGulf was a collective win as a result. To honor those who worked hard, and made a big difference with little steps, I’d like to offer the positives before the challenges.

Positive Lessons

Citizen Philanthropy: This effort was an initiative based in empowering citizens to act, and they did. Given the nature of the oil spill, providing mindful action for concerned citizens was a challenge, and one we felt compelled to offer after our fact finding mission. Clearly, as tough as an issue as it was, others felt the same. The 1000 plus people who took action, and 400 plus who donated are the big winners.

Social Media Works: We had no budget, and no paid staff other than the time that Citizen Effect dedicated to the effort. Everyone else volunteered, and all the tools and design were provided for free. The whole effort was done on a shoe string, and was possible because free social tools empower activism.

Crowdsourcing on a National Level: We took a hands-off approach to local events encouraging people to become creative and make the events their own. The Tar Ball took off in Houston and DC had a date auction. In North Carolina, Rob Blackwell created a song! DC’s Jess3 contributed an EventBrite landing page. Chicago and LA had concerts, and New York featured a movie. It was awesome to see the creativity!

Citizen Journalism: The citizen journalism last June was an incredible success, driving incredible awareness about the plight of the fishing families, prompting people to ask us what was next, and if they could get involved. I wouldn’t hesitate to do this again as a means of open research, sharing knowledge and driving interest.

New Relationships: Whenever you do something like that involves mass action and face-to-face interaction, you create all sorts of new relationships for others as well as yourself. I think anyone who invested serious time in CitizenGulf is already seeing the intangible benefits this week in their online networks.

Believing: Sometimes when something as bad as the oil spill occurs, the lying, the malfeasance, and the inept governance that oversaw the effort, people stop believing. Ironically, Obama’s campaign promise of, “Yes, We Can,” while it may not hold true for his administration, did come true for CitizenGulf. I think most people believe that even with a simple registration or even a tweet they made a difference. And for eight kids they did. It’s important that people see this and know it, because believing your actions matter is the antithesis of the growing lack of empathy we are seeing in society today.

Challenges

WeekPrior.jpg
Twitter Activity the Week Prior to CitizenGulf Events

Some of the challenges were external and beyond our control, and some were internal and provide an opportunity for learning. As one of the public leadership points of contact for CitizenGulf, and arguably the most visible, I want to state now that these are my opinions, and also from my standpoint, the internal challenges are my responsibility. I share these simply to offer lessons learned for staging events of this magnitude.

Crowdsourcing on the Executive Level: We put together a dream team of volunteers to lead the effort on the fly. Yet, at times this was hard for all parties.

Because the effort was discussed orally, and expectations were not put in writing so everyone understood their roles, we had some branding and promotion issues that made CitizenGulf less visible than it could have been. Also, this lack of clarity caused our effort to become more complicated than necessary, and I received feedback from local organizers that they did not understand calls-to-action, etc. Again, I see these errors as my fault, and I apologize for any problems this caused.

With a group managed movement like this, Memorandums of Understanding should be deployed so that everything is in writing and roles clearly defined. It also may be worthwhile to have a smaller team, with clearer executive roles.

The Local Cause: Because we picked a charity that only worked within eight parishes of Louisiana and because it was religious, we had some more explaining to do. Our fact finding mission showed that Catholic Charities of New Orleans was doing the most work with fishermen, but I think it was a stretch for some people, and it could have been better explained.

Pepsi Refresh: As part of putting together the dream team, we added a Pepsi Refresh contest to the calls-to-action. But the contest entry did not read like a CitizenGulf effort, and didn’t integrate well. Plus an ensuing controversy the week the contest opened about Pepsi Refresh’s Gulf initiative pretty much submarined this call to action right out of the gates.

Posterous: Posterous was generally a good blogging platform, but had significant DNS attacks the week of the event launch which stymied momentum. Posterous does not currently let you use its code on your own server. If we had made the decision to use WordPress on our own server, we would not have had such an issue. We had 18 business days to market the event and lost roughly two to Posterous issues. As you can see, relying on a platform outside of your control can have its downside.

Conclusion

As you can see there were more positives than negatives, and because of the outstanding way some local leaders took on the crowdsourcing challenge, a successful movement was built in a short period of time. Most importantly, people were provided with and took up mindful actions to build a positive result in the wake of BP and the Obama Administration’s combined mismanagement of the oil spill disaster.

As a whole, I see fundraising via social media as a secondary result, not a primary goal (See May interview where I stated this). For the amount of time spent, there are better primary ways to raise money. Movements like this are better for education, and to empower citizen philanthropists to act. That being said, we still helped out eight to ten children this year, and that’s a very powerful statement.

Personally, I feel like I could easily replicate and improve the citizengulf movement building process. If I had a budget and more lead time, the results would be extremely potent in comparison. The #citizengulf experience was invaluable in that sense.

Finally, I have so much more respect for Amanda Rose and the incredible job she did with Twestival. To do this three times with the level of success she has had is simply astounding.

Thank you to everyone who participated. I think we made the interwebs a better place this Summer with the CitizenGulf initiative and we made a real difference for children who were impacted by this disaster.

Citizen Effect will continue the CitizenGulf Project. You can create your own initiative to benefit Gulf kids, or you can still give if you’d like. Here’s the donation page.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Thank You, #CitizenGulf

Posted on: August 26th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 3 Comments

scaled500.png

Yesterday’s national day of CitizenGulf events ranged from the first Social Media Club event in Fredericksburg, VA to a big get together in Honolulu, Hawaii. With tickets starting at $10 a pop, it looks like 400 people came together and raised roughly $10,000 (preliminary estimate) benefiting at least eight children of fishing families in the Catholic Charities of New Orleans After School Program.

Considering that this whole effort is volunteer based on literally no budget and named after a hashtag, I am just stunned. Two months ago, four of us were heading down to the Gulf on a fact finding mission with no idea about what we would find. And two months later we had this incredible day of action, thanks to you.

Next week I’ll provide a post mortem analysis of what did and did not work about the campaign from my perspective. Today and this weekend are all about cherishing the action so many of us have taken towards a positive, mindful result after the oil spill. With BP and Obama responsible for and promising everything, and often falling short, this is not the easiest cause to take on, but a very important one. Taking mindful steps — instead of staying angry and letting the Gulf suffer — are acts of compassion.

There are so many of us who participated, from the more than 750 people who tweeted to the more than 400 people who attended our 20 events. Jeff Dolan even made a tribute music video! I know of at least 60 blog posts written about the Day of Action. It’s impossible to thank everyone, so please forgive me if I’ve forgotten you.

First, let me thank Dan Morrison and May Yu of Citizen Effect, and Jill Foster of LiveYourTalk. It’s amazing how far this crazy little trip went. And Dan, did you think the fajitas at Lauriol Plaza would turn into this?

Eric Johnson at El Studio deserves a huge thanks for designing our Posterous blog, and for his work migrating the site. Thank you to my long term cohort on cause based action Andy Sternberg for his hard work and running the LA event.

Thank you to Sloane Berrent and Taylor Davidson for letting us co-promote with Gulf Coast Benefits. I can’t wait to see what you do next. And a huge thanks to Social Media Club co-founders Kristie Wells and Chris Heuer for believing in CitizenGulf and making it an official Club event.

Thank you to David Bazea and Citrix Online for donating your organizing software and phone services. Michael Ivey, thank you for donating RT2Give set-up. And thanks to iShake for donating proceeds from iPhone application sales.

I want to give a special thanks to a few city captains who just took CitizenGulf on and made it theirs. Gloria Bell (Philly), Kami Huyse and Grace Rodriguez (Houston), Richard Laermer (who helped me co-organize NYC), Heidi Massey (Chicago), and last, but not least Andi Narvaez (DC, our top fundraiser). Each of these cities raised $1000 or more! Also, I owe a personal thank you to Kelly Mitchell (Honolulu), Todd Van Hoosear (Boston), Alex de Carvalho (Miami), Heather Coleman (Fredericksburg), and “Calamity Jen,” Jennifer Navarete, and Colleen Pence (San Antonio) for organizing their cities! Thank you to all of our other city organizers for going the distance.

And finally, as co-organizer of the New York City event, I’d like to thank my committee of outreach kings and queens. Thank you to Damien Basile, Anna Curran, Erica Grigg (Carbon Outreach), Nicole D’Alonzo, Howard Greenstein, and our special guest Eric Proulx! CitizenGulf would not have been the same with New York!

Again, if I missed you, please forgive me. Thanks so much!

Citizen Effect will continue the CitizenGulf Project. You can create your own initiative to benefit Gulf kids, or you can still give if you’d like. Here’s the donation page.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Twitter for Nonprofits by @hayduke – #ztrain 4

Posted on: August 24th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston No Comments

photo2.JPG
This is the fourth session from Ted Fickes, a #ZTraining on Twitter given to the Colorado Nonprofit Association.

Lots of basic stats about Twitter – 35 million U.S. users in June, 93 million worldwide. 5% are female and 69% are caucasian. Far higher use by African American and Hispanic use. The site grew by 109 percent year over year from June 2009-2010.

Ted says the trick is to find, be found by, and interact with key audiences. Strong Twitter users are influential in the field. And search results matter. So for example, the #ztrain hashtag will make this event more searchable in Google.

Great advice: Don’t worry about appealing to everyone. Instead focus on the issues that matter to you. Share a common interest and dialogue as it will likely put you together with more influentials. Influentials, care more, write more and tweet more. Bloggers, writes and journalists are included in this group. Ted says following people back critical for growth, and to thank people for the follow (but don’t auto message them).

Search is an underpinning of following, retweeting, replies. Searches help you do the things that matter on important topics. An end result of Twitter online is search in other places. Oneforty.com is a great place to find Twitter tools and applications to help with search.

Retweeting on Twitter is important, but many people prefer to use applications like HootSuite for more functionality. Write to be retweeted. 120 characters gets it done. Remember tweets are meant for someone. Speak t people, reply, use DMs, have conversations.

Adding connectivity via Twitter profiles to your site is critical for connections. You can customize your twitter profile to show staff on your profile page. TweetyGotBack is a tool for creating Twitter backgrounds.

Integrating it to Facebook is doable. Some feel it’s not advisable. Many screen the types of Tweets that go through. It’s really a hard place to do fundraising.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Facebook for Nonprofits – #ztrain 3

Posted on: August 24th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 2 Comments

This is the third session from Worldways Social Marketing, a #ZTraining on Facebook given to the Colorado Nonprofit Association. Mark Marosits and Andrea Hill gave the entry level presentation. There were a lot of questions during this session so it was hard to get through all of the content.

photo.JPG

The thing that ties us together that anyone can publish anything. That also means there’s a lot more competition. So how do we get others to share our message?

Why Facebook? It makes things very easy to share. If your audience is out there, then it makes sense. And most audiences are on Facebook. THere are four core concepts:

1) Liking is everything
2) People like and trust other people
3) Information flows in a stream
4) Follower numbers are a measurement, but not a final objective. Don’t get caught up on the numbers.

Liking is important because it feeds stories into other people’s streams. And liking creates more liking, creating more and more potential for friends of friends to see information. This is important because recommendations from others are the most trusted source of information according to Nielsen (90%).

Information flows on the stream in Facebook. Post things at appropriate times to affect your audience. Weekends and nights have different people online compared to business days. Information is seen in fragments, and may not be seen at all. Keep that in mind.

Followers do not equal donors or volunteers. IF the followers are relevant followers, they help reach the right people – more ears help.

Facebook Pages

Some things you can do with Facebook – have people click through, or use Facebook as a micro-site for a short-term campaign. Your page can become the all inclusive center-point for your social activity.

People like people, so give your posts personality. Respond and engage with posters, tag your name onto an organizational post (see Chipotle page). Have roles assigned to staffers so redundancy is built.

Keep in mind Facebook is not meant to be deep. Use descriptive information to get people to click through. People like people, especially themselves. That’s why giving them the opportunity to sound off via questions is critical. Always post a question with a link.

Facebook Insights has invaluable information. Use it to measure your efforts, from the value of click throughs to demographics.

.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Principles of Effective Social Media Strategy – #ztrain 2

Posted on: August 24th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston No Comments

IMG_0012.jpg.scaled1000.jpg

This is the second session from Beth Kanter’s Zoetica Training on social media given to the Colorado Nonprofit Association.

Listening is the beginning of the exercise. There are many tools to listen with, and knowing the key words that matter helps. Look for the conversations, look for the influencers and what they are talking about.

Moving from messages to conversation starters is a critical transition. How do we ask questions? What do we do? Consider the San Jose Opera and how they interact with people on Twitter.

As you go out and build your network you can start to see who is having conversations with you. And who are they having conversations with? Are they integral to your community? Know your folowers, develop relationships by listening and having conversations.

Integrate content, give yourself link love on your social properties. Developing content is a critical aspect, and you have to have different strategies for different social media. Your content needs to be integrated, sharing across channels. It’s a good idea to have editorial missions for your web site. Cites Danielle Brigada and National Wildlife Federation’s efforts.

You need capacity to succeed. Who is going to create the content free, interns, staff, executives? Interns have been used, but don’t dump on them without integrating them into the team, and giving them meaningful work.

It’s important to measure. But don’t spend more time to collecting and analyzing data than doing. Learn the lessons, and move on. Make mistakes, keep experimenting and growing.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Becoming a Network Nonprofit – #ztrain

Posted on: August 24th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston No Comments

IMG_0013.jpg

This is the first session from Beth Kanter’s Zoetica Training on social media given to the Colorado Nonprofit Association.

Networked Nonprofits are simple transparent organizations that let insiders get out, and outsiders in. They work to make their communities better places to leave.

If nonprofit organizations want to affect change with complex social problems, they need to immerse themselves within complex networks. Currently, nonprofits work as stand alone organizations as silos, and people are stuck within departments.

Changing an organization to become more fluid is hard. Creating a social culture, trust through transparency, simplicity, listening is the hard stuff. Working in the social media world, the being, is the easy stuff. You need to be before you do. Beth highlighted Surfrider Foundation, Mom’s Rising, Charity: Water as examples.

A social culture uses social media to engage people inside and outside the organization to improve programs, services, or reach communication goals. Skepticism is a huge barrier; re: Loss of control, mistakes, etc. Working through these barriers are huge.

Nonprofit leaders must experience personal use of social media. They need to experience a reverse mentoring with their younger staff. It’s important to focus on the results, and discuss outcomes as opposed to the tools.

Unlearning the culture of don’t fail is critical. Learning how to make mistakes, learning how not to be be perfect, but to get out there and experiment is critical to social media success. Give techniques that you experiment with eulogies. Have joyful funerals. The Humane Society of the United States does post mortem meetings after every initiative.

Becoming a Social Culture

Codifying a social culture via policy makes it a management issue that execs need to own. Take some of the policies that are already out there, customize it to your culture. People make mistakes, the organization has new cultural challenges. Your policy needs to be a living document that evolves.

How do you balance personal profiles and business? Beth highlights Wendy Harman and the American Red Cross‘s social media policy. Wendy says, I don’t put anything online that would embarrass my mother.

In context, consider the social media fortress. The hallmark is the private retreat with five day decisions by themselves without including anyone else. They want control.

There are many layers of this, the transactionals (ask, ask, ask) are the most common. Relationships are missing. More and more organizations are adding relationship training. The ultimate of this is the transparents which take and let go of water is a sponge.

The Indianapolis Museum of Art is the ultimate example of the social media sponge. Their tracking dashboard is out on their site and discussed on the blog. Radical transparency like this is a big step.

There are different shades of gray, and some things should be private. One question to consider is what if the default should be open… Keep testing, keep challenging what works.

Free agents can implode on a fortressed organization. How an organization decides to embrace the free agent is critical. If they don’t, it becomes publicly antagonistic. If they do, they can work together towards common goals. Beth highlights Shawn Ahmed.

How does one become optimal in time use? Focus on what you do best. Charity: Water fundraises with social media and then works with organizations that build well. They don’t build the wells, instead finding partners who need the funds. What can your organization do less of, simplify and outsource?

Use the tools to help accomplish business goals. Find impassioned volunteers and interested parties that can help. San Francisco SPCA has volunteers running their YouTube channel.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Nearly 76% of Facebook Users Find BP Irresponsible or Criminal

Posted on: August 23rd, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 4 Comments

These survey results are being released in conjunction with the CitizenGulf events held on Wednesday, August 25 this week. The benefit meet-ups seek to help fishing families affected by the oil spill with education programs. Register today.

OilSpillResults.jpg

As part of its efforts to sway American opinion about its responsible approach towards the Deep Horizon oil spill clean-up, BP engaged in a significant advertising campaign, with major online components including social media properties and search engine buys. Ogilvy 360 was brought on to help with the effort. So nearly three months later and four months after the spill how are those efforts working out for BP?

Not so well as a MyType survey reveals. Seventy five percent of all Facebook respondents thought BP was either very irresponsible or criminal in its actions.

The survey was conducted during the past week of 3,000 US Facebook respondents, normalized to the general US population.  Survey respondents were offered one open ended statement, “BP’s oil spill was…,” and offered four answers:

  • A technical malfunction that the company cannot be blamed for
  • An honest mistake
  • Very irresponsible
  • Criminal

When you look under the covers, the survey shows at best some mixed results that are very polarized by children, age, income and environmental. All of the results are statistically significant. Here’s an analysis:

Families

Families were more likely to see BP as criminally responsible for the disaster than single adults. Fifty three percent of two children families thought BP was very irresponsible, while a whopping 29 percent thought the oil company was criminally at fault. Single adults were 56% leaning towards very irresponsible but only 17% thought the company was criminal.

One and thee children families had similar results as two kid families, but large families skewed the other way with 25% thinking BP was not to blame, and another 25% believing the company made an honest mistake.

The Older Are Less Forgiving

BPTeens.jpg

Older Facebook users were much less forgiving of BP than teenagers. No where was this more pronounced that those aged 40-49 years old, who did not believe BP was innocent. Fifty six percent of this demographic found BP very irresponsible and 23% said the company was criminal. Teens on the other hand felt differently, with 51% believing the company was very irresponsible, and only 8% criminal. Twenty three percent of teens thought BP made an honest mistake.

Income

Generally speaking, wealthy people were more likely to let BP off the hook. Twenty one percent of those making greater than $200,000 felt BP had no blame, while only 9 percent thought the company was criminal in its actions. Those making less than $200,000 had an almost opposite point of view: Eleven percent thought the company had no blame while 20% thought the company was criminal in its actions. Both demographics had groups of greater than 55% who thought BP was very irresponsible.

Environmentalists

Forty one percent of true environmentalists though BP was criminal in its actions, but more telling was the group who identify with green issues as very important — or green consumers. Twenty two percent thought BP was criminal in its actions, while another 60% thought the company was very irresponsible. Those who feel the environment is not very important had a 42% very irresponsible ratio, and only 5% criminal.

Variances in Race

There were great variances in race, particularly when in came to designating BP as criminal in its actions. Twenty four percent of hispanic respondents thought BP was criminal, compared to 19% of caucasian, 18% of African Americans, 12% of East Asians, and an astoundingly low 7% of Middle Easterners. This may be attributed to the heavy reliance of the Middle Eastern economies on oil production.

Psychology of Respondents

One of the cool things about MyType is its psychological profiles. While I just analyzed traditional demographic break-outs, MyType can show those inclined towards Power or Imagination. The respondents’ psychological profiles reveal intriguing insights into how personality shapes our perspective towards BP. 

“Those who highly value power, for instance, are nearly 5 times more likely than others to choose the “technical malfunction” answer, assigning absolutely no blame to BP,” said Tim Koelkebeck, founder and CEO of MyType.  “Intellectuals, too, are 36% more likely to choose either that answer or the “honest mistake” response.  But others are much less forgiving. 

“Aesthetes – those who like poetry, believe in the importance of art and “see beauty in things that others might not notice”, among other things – are roughly 40% more likely to hold BP criminally responsible.  And for whatever reason, procrastinators are a full 70% more likely to hold BP criminally responsible.”

You can contact MyType for the full survey results via email info [at] mytype.com.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Where ADL Went Wrong with Its Mosque Stance

Posted on: August 16th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 13 Comments

Ancestors: Six Brothers Livingston

Livingston Family Photo undated (believed to be c 1896 to 1899) – Six Sons of Mayer and Dora Livingston (.b Meyer Y Dusschen [Blumenfeld] Lowenstein) Location unknown, but presumed to be in Bloomington, Illinois. Back Row (left to right): Irvin I. Livingston (my great grandfather), Alfred Livingston, Herman Livingston. Front Row (left to right): Sigmund Livingston (started the Jewish Anti Defamation League); Harold Livingston; Maurice Livingston.

We’ve all seen the news about the proposed mosque two blocks from the World Trade Center. Many feel that while there are constitutional and local ordinances that clearly permit such a building, that given the supposed fundamental stance of the Islamic funders and the feelings of 9-11 victims, the mosque should not be built. One such organization is the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) with its stance. This brand failure should be reversed at the earliest opportunity.

To be clear, I have a personal stake – albeit a small one – in the ADL’s wayward position. Siegfried Livingston, my great grand uncle, founded the league in 1913.

The mission of the ADL is to prevent discrimination, in particular that of Jewish people. ADL’s own tag line says, “to secure justice and fair treatment of all.” While ADL’s current leadership may feel the mosque is in poor taste and offensive to current families, they have forgotten the principles in their own commitment to “counteract hatred, prejudice and bigotry.”

Principles cannot be compromised by situations. Arguments against the mosque — well intended or not — counteract first amendment rights and seek to use local ordinances to enforce segregation, similar to the Jewish Ghettos of pre World War II.

The real ADL principles demand that we cannot use type of religious worship in this would-be building — regardless of the historical impact of September 11, 2009 –as an excuse to prevent construction. These principles cannot be compromised! And ADL’s promise to the world is to fight for them.

Few Personal Experiences

Progress at Ground Zero 9-11

Lest I be considered insensitive about this matter, I’d like to offer a few personal experiences:

1) I live in the other 9-11 city, the one where the establishment doesn’t publicly remember the bombing of the Pentagon too often. I watched that building burn from my office tower in Tysons Corner. I knew people who carried the dead out of the Pentagon, and sat in fear in my Arlington home wondering if we were under attack.

2) My maternal grandfather Jean Bigar came to America because local Swiss officials told him to flee the Nazis marching through Switzerland on their way to bulwark Mussolini’s Italy. He was free to be a Jew here in the United States. He ended up moving back to Switzerland in time, but I am here because we as a country embraced religious tolerance.

3) In my own young life in Philadelphia, we lived in a suburban neighborhood — Glenside, PA — and suffered persecution, including a swastika painted on our door, our house egged, tires slashed, and regular bullying of my sister and I. We were persecuted for the faith of our ancestors.

I understand religious persecution, and I know the impact of 9-11. This is America, and the best way to demonstrate the strength of our principles and to honor the fallen victims of 9-11 who died unwillingly for this country is to let these people build their mosque. In spite of fundamentalist views. Otherwise we become what we fear the most, a country or group of people that will sacrifice principles (religious or humanistic) to achieve political outcomes.

The ADL needs to reverse its statement and go back to the principles it was founded on and meant to defend. Without unwavering commitment to principles, its brand can only suffer the decay of the untrustworthy. ADL has failed to live up to its commitments to the public, and, in my personal opinion, its founder SIegfried Livingston.

Popularity: 2% [?]

10 Reasons to Attend a #CitizenGulf Event

Posted on: August 15th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston No Comments

Oil Boom Workers
Oil boom workers

The CitizenGulf meet-ups are less than two weeks away, and you’re probably wondering whether to attend. Here are 10 good reasons to join your local Social Media Club for a Gulf Coast Benefit on August 25.

1) It’s the last party of the summer! Come on out and join your online friends for a good time that does good, too!

2) You like New Orleans, and want to relive a little of that Bourbon Street fun.

3) Help fishing families affected by the oil spill like Kerry’s and this little girl.

4) Attend in memory of Hurricane Katrina, and all the lives it took five years ago on August 28.

5) Don’t believe in BP? Neither do we. Show up and make a statement to the oil company that its PR messages to help the Gulf and its citizens recover are not enough.

6) Similarly, make a statement to the Obama Administration that more needs to be done.

7) The Gulf had just started to get back on its feet after Katrina and Rita. Now the oil spill happens. Let’s finish the Gulf recovery.

8) Your $10 cover fee (and any additional donations) goes directly to the Citizen Effect citizengulf program, funding Catholic charities of New Orleans After School Assembly Program for the 2010-2011 school year.

9) You believe educating children is the way to build stronger communities.

10) Your cover charge is tax deductible because Citizen Effect is a 501c3.

So what are you waiting for? Come on out and have a good time while doing some good, too!

Popularity: 1% [?]

Making Lemonade in New York City

Posted on: August 11th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 1 Comment

As co-host of CitizenGulf NYC on 8/25, I am thrilled to welcome Erik Proulx (@eproulx on Twitter), executive producer of Lemonade as our guest speaker. Lemonade is an inspirational film about 16 advertising professionals who lost their jobs and found their calling, encouraging people to listen to that little voice inside their head that asks, “What if?”

For an event that’s dedicated to educating the children of fishing families so they can find a new way of life (via Catholic Charities of New Orleans), this is the right speaker! What do people who were once paid for a living do when they’re laid off or see their career reduced by an event like the oil spill? Hopefully, they get creative with their own lives.

Fitting a nonprofit type of event, all resources for Lemonade were donated. From cameras to lights to flights, this is a project by and for those who have been affected by unemployment.

We will be screening the 30 minute movie in a second room at the Pour House. If you are in my network and in New York City on August 25th, I hope you’ll join us for what promises to be an inspirational evening about, “What if?” and doing good for the Gulf. Register today.

Popularity: 1% [?]