Archive for the ‘Pop Philosophy’ Category

Thank You, #CitizenGulf

Posted on: August 26th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 3 Comments

scaled500.png

Yesterday’s national day of CitizenGulf events ranged from the first Social Media Club event in Fredericksburg, VA to a big get together in Honolulu, Hawaii. With tickets starting at $10 a pop, it looks like 400 people came together and raised roughly $10,000 (preliminary estimate) benefiting at least eight children of fishing families in the Catholic Charities of New Orleans After School Program.

Considering that this whole effort is volunteer based on literally no budget and named after a hashtag, I am just stunned. Two months ago, four of us were heading down to the Gulf on a fact finding mission with no idea about what we would find. And two months later we had this incredible day of action, thanks to you.

Next week I’ll provide a post mortem analysis of what did and did not work about the campaign from my perspective. Today and this weekend are all about cherishing the action so many of us have taken towards a positive, mindful result after the oil spill. With BP and Obama responsible for and promising everything, and often falling short, this is not the easiest cause to take on, but a very important one. Taking mindful steps — instead of staying angry and letting the Gulf suffer — are acts of compassion.

There are so many of us who participated, from the more than 750 people who tweeted to the more than 400 people who attended our 20 events. Jeff Dolan even made a tribute music video! I know of at least 60 blog posts written about the Day of Action. It’s impossible to thank everyone, so please forgive me if I’ve forgotten you.

First, let me thank Dan Morrison and May Yu of Citizen Effect, and Jill Foster of LiveYourTalk. It’s amazing how far this crazy little trip went. And Dan, did you think the fajitas at Lauriol Plaza would turn into this?

Eric Johnson at El Studio deserves a huge thanks for designing our Posterous blog, and for his work migrating the site. Thank you to my long term cohort on cause based action Andy Sternberg for his hard work and running the LA event.

Thank you to Sloane Berrent and Taylor Davidson for letting us co-promote with Gulf Coast Benefits. I can’t wait to see what you do next. And a huge thanks to Social Media Club co-founders Kristie Wells and Chris Heuer for believing in CitizenGulf and making it an official Club event.

Thank you to David Bazea and Citrix Online for donating your organizing software and phone services. Michael Ivey, thank you for donating RT2Give set-up. And thanks to iShake for donating proceeds from iPhone application sales.

I want to give a special thanks to a few city captains who just took CitizenGulf on and made it theirs. Gloria Bell (Philly), Kami Huyse and Grace Rodriguez (Houston), Richard Laermer (who helped me co-organize NYC), Heidi Massey (Chicago), and last, but not least Andi Narvaez (DC, our top fundraiser). Each of these cities raised $1000 or more! Also, I owe a personal thank you to Kelly Mitchell (Honolulu), Todd Van Hoosear (Boston), Alex de Carvalho (Miami), Heather Coleman (Fredericksburg), and “Calamity Jen,” Jennifer Navarete, and Colleen Pence (San Antonio) for organizing their cities! Thank you to all of our other city organizers for going the distance.

And finally, as co-organizer of the New York City event, I’d like to thank my committee of outreach kings and queens. Thank you to Damien Basile, Anna Curran, Erica Grigg (Carbon Outreach), Nicole D’Alonzo, Howard Greenstein, and our special guest Eric Proulx! CitizenGulf would not have been the same with New York!

Again, if I missed you, please forgive me. Thanks so much!

Citizen Effect will continue the CitizenGulf Project. You can create your own initiative to benefit Gulf kids, or you can still give if you’d like. Here’s the donation page.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Don’t Believe the BP Hype!

Posted on: August 19th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 2 Comments

How The Hell Are We Supposed Feed Our Kids Now

Let’s be frank, lots of people are helping with #citizengulf and it’s awesome. There are so many people spreading the word, I can’t even begin to thank them. But this is not Haiti, in large part because of BP’s responsibility for causing the oil spill, and its moral and legal obligation to clean up the mess.

Many people express this to me, “Why should I help? It’s BP’s fault!”

But as we have seen over and over again, BP continues to promise fully responsible actions, only to have its actions completely contradict its PR and messaging. Consider the most recent lies that have been exposed this week:

1) The oil is not gone from the Gulf waters. In fact, University of Georgia scientists have done a study showing that 70-79% of the oil remains in the water. Now we see the role dispersants have played in this Dantean nightmare.

2) Phytoplankton, the base element of the fishing food chain, have been poisoned by this oil. This means the entire Gulf food supply has been affected and will have crude oil poisoning to contend with.

This continued public lying (and the co-signing of this behavior by the Obama Administration) should tell all of us one thing: BP will abandon its responsibility to clean up the Gulf at the first opportunity. The Gulf cannot count on BP or the federal government to resolve this situation.

Any of us would be furious if our homes and livelihoods were treated in such a fashion. In fact, many of us who do not live in the Gulf are angered by the public hucksterism we are being offered by BP and the Obama Administration. But what can we do about it? Plenty, and as my trip to the Gulf convinced me, this hurricane ravaged region definitely needs our help.

The citizengulf program was designed to provide easy, mindful actions to affect change, specifically, by using education to provide fishing families new opportunities for a brighter, more sustainable future. I hope you’ll join us on August 25 as we take a day of action together by attending an event, donating or voting.

Beyond the citizengulf program, there are more mindful actions: Write your elected officials and tell them to stand up to big oil and large corporations ruining our country, live a better sustainable life, and restore ethics to the communications profession. Want more? The AARP offers six ways you can make a difference for the Gulf.

No , it’s not Haiti. But it’s happening in our own back yard at the hands of corrupt oil company with the federal government cosigning it. Whatever you do, friends, I encourage you not to sit this one out. In my mind, it’s a civic duty. Take mindful action and say no to BP.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Those Murky Personal Brand Waters

Posted on: August 5th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 5 Comments

PastedGraphic-1.png

As some of you know, I’ve been polling my online community to gage their feelings on personal brands.  Given my very outspoken nature against personal branding, it’s safe to assume that those who participate in active conversation with me likely skew unfavorably towards the self marketing theory.  Still, given the concept’s popularity I expected a much more polarized result than the above data.

What this chart shows are two small groups within this particular social network that feel strongly for personal branding (15%) or against it (21%).  However, if you consolidate the two middle of the road answers — depends and both — a vast majority feel ambivalent about personal branding (58%).  That’s a pretty powerful number.

PastedGraphic-2.png

What this tells me is that while people see the merits of personal branding, they also see the detriments.  Thus the uncommitted response of my fellow community members. We all want to look good and want to present ourselves in a becoming manner, but not to the point that we seem like over contrived, fake people. By its very nomenclature, the term “personal brand” creates a connotation towards the latter.

Take Aways

In the end, it’s about being smart.  Present a good face, but know that your reputation will ultimately be decided by the actions you bring to bear, not the consistency of your presentation. At best, the presentation will only get you a shot to be on the stage. Your performance is the ultimate barometer.

Also, if you’re a professional marketing yourself for either projects or career opportunities, be very wary of calling your public persona a personal brand. Whether or not you believe in the theory, many don’t and your choice of words could cost you the job, especially if it’s apples to apples. No one wants to add a team member that will put themselves ahead of the project, and that’s the worst case perception of a personal brand.

What do you think?

P.S.

I am calling the remaining six percent who said none of the above “original thinkers.”

Popularity: 4% [?]

Scale or Say No

Posted on: July 22nd, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 17 Comments

New York Times Building

There’s a growing symphony of voices from our more well known friends that publicly demands cash for time, whether that be for a call, a lunch or a day. The underlying tone of these statements is anger towards frequent requests for time from their communities. But in reality, this problem should not be pushed back onto the community. Instead, social media “stars” should learn to scale or just say no.

Friends, let me say as another person who is just inundated with requests for free and paid uses of my time, I empathize. But let’s not allow success to become an excuse for the poor-mes or brash statements.

Allowing oneself to feel victimized by success is not really an accurate way to look at things. There are no victims in this, only volunteers. We have blogged, checked-in, and tweeted ourselves into this position, one we wanted from the outset.

Really, these are opportunities, great choices on how to spend our time. Building intelligent systems to scale our work, or to better select the opportunities we really want and say no to the rest is the great entrepreneurial challenge here.

Ways to Mindfully Say No

Teaching one to scale a business takes years of operational and management experience. Book smarts will only get you so far, much less a blog post. However, it is easier to talk about mindfully saying no.

Brash statements about wasting one’s time generally hurt the larger conversation and can violate community trust vested in someone who they thought wanted a relationship. In essence, what may be a statement of frustration or an attempt at a boundary becomes a brick wall.

Now I am not a master at the art of saying no gracefully. I have gotten better over time, and I have learned methods at knowing when to do it. Here are some that I use:

Qualifying

One aspect of building value online is the requests it creates, the source of tension that has inspired this post. These are leads and opportunities, some to help, some to network, some to speak (free and paid), and some for tangible business opportunities.

Like a good salesperson, I qualify time opportunities. How much time does it require? If a lot, where will that time come from? Is this important for my family or community? Will it benefit Zoetica? If it’s at the cost of my personal well being, family or business, I usually say no.

Saying no really means saying no. For example, I am sorry, due to workload we cannot respond to this RFP. Or, I am sorry, I am expecting a baby this fall, and have decided not to travel for the remainder of the year.

People are not necessarily going to be happy about a no. However, again prioritizing time expenditures — my most valuable resource — is crucial. Offering replacements or other suggestions can help, but again, I’ve learned to try to be as polite as possible, and accept that someone may be disappointed.

Setting Expectations in Social Media

I try to set expectations on social networks. When on Facebook or Twitter, if you correspond with me publicly I will respond no matter what. I am not on Twitter during the weekends and most nights, but can be found on Facebook periodically during off hours. In addition, I remain committed to blog four or five times a week.

I have no commitment to be present at any time on my other social networks, intentionally. I show when I can or feel like it. A choice to do well in some social networks versus others.

The remaining time belongs to family and business. Another choice.

Off Social Network Access

Online I do not publish my phone number anymore, this is strictly a client or existing relationship contact method. So this means almost all in-bound opportunities come electronically. I appreciate that there are people who have larger communities than me who respond to almost every email.

I have stopped doing this. In fact, I just started using AwayFind as an autoresponder to all in-bound emails. It’s my intent to set a polite expectation that I won’t respond to every contact. It’s important for me, someone who receives hundreds of emails everyday, to reallocate email response time to actual client work, book writing, and most importantly, family.

My bacon account response (geoffliving [at] me.com) for PR people, pitches and social network contacts is set for a daily response. That daily responder says:

“Thanks for contacting me. I’m only able to check email a few times each day. Because of the high frequency of pitches and requests I receive, I am unable to respond to every email. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Enjoy the rest of your day.”

My work/client email responds once a month, and swaps out some of the language for a statement that offers a phone number for timely situations.

My friends, I only have my experience in this matter. But let us not cry foul about an overabundance of opportunities to be of service to others – paid or unpaid. Instead, let us be grateful for quality problems, the kind that when approached mindfully yield rewarding personal and/or financial results. Just my $0.02.

Popularity: 4% [?]

Three $20 Billion Escrow Fund PR Takeaways

Posted on: June 18th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 1 Comment

100617_obama_walks_ap_328.jpg

Yesterday’s news about the $20 million escrow fund sparked a debate about Obama’s consistent use of power on behalf of the public interest against large corporations (AP Photo). It’s an interesting conversation, and it’s ironic to watch the GOP, the party of Teddy Roosevelt — a.k.a. the Trust Buster — object to this action. But for me, while this may be a GOP mud flinging point, there are really three big $20 million takeaways from a PR perspective.

1) Obama is the big winner. For once, we are debating about whether or not our vulcan-like leader went too far in protecting the Gulf’s interests. Isn’t that refreshing?

2) BP gets points, too. By acquiescing, BP demonstrated in a very real way that when held to the flame, the company is willing to go to any length to set things right. Because it’s escrow if the full $20 billion isn’t used, BP gets the remaining money back. Further, it’s a commitment to pay money over time (as opposed to a lump sum), and it demonstrates to investors a finite penalty. Pay your dividends, BP!

3) The GOP loses. The GOP does have a point to make in its stance against reactionary policy during this crisis. This battle is best fought in the restructuring of energy policy and MMS. Defending BP’s “poor interests” was a mistake. Even the rest of the oil industry has thrown BP under the bus, and the GOP would have been wise to let BP serve as a sacrificial lamb.

Why? This is not your average big company abuse. This is the worst environmental crisis of our time. It’s an extraordinary situation. By criticizing something that BP voluntarily agreed to, the GOP makes itself — in particular Joe Barton — look insensitive. Choose your battles, folks.

What do you think about the $20 billion escrow?

P.S. Citizen Effect’s Dan Morrison and My Yu will join me on a mission to the Gulf on June 27 – July 1 to help affected fishermen. Details are here.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Only Mindful Action Can Help the Gulf

Posted on: June 6th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 1 Comment

force-mp-gandhi and crowd.jpg

There have been many acts of anger towards BP over the past week, including protests to seize the company’s assets, using apps to create oil spills on browsers viewing stories mentioning BP, and efforts to tarnish the company’s logo. It’s totally understandable. Punishing this company for its clear and continuing wrongs relieves a very human need.

Yet, such acts fail to help the Gulf marine environment, suffering wildlife, and the many fisherman and local businesses getting decimated by the Deep Horizon catastrophe. Only mindful actions and protests can successfully and positively benefit those people that need us the most.

One of the greatest heroes of all time — Mohandas Ghandi — demonstrated that you can topple an empire by taking spiritually grounded mindful political action. It seems paramount to remember Ghandi’s lessons as we move through this crisis.

What Actually Helps

Seizing BP’s assets strikes me as the exact wrong thing to do. The company needs to remain viable so it can actually pay for the reparations it owes.

Further, as a moderate Democrat it’s been easy to laugh at cries from extreme elements about a socialist administration. That’s because it’s clear that these elements possess a great ignorance about what socialism and Marxism actually are. But a government seizing a company’s assets meets the text book definition of socialization. That kind of action will not benefit anyone, in my opinion. The U.S. government can’t effectively regulate the oil industry much less run an oil company.

BP (as well as Haliburton and Transocean) must be held accountable. I totally agree with this logic. But the situation remains more complicated. As this New York Times article demonstrates, the Obama Administration — specifically MMS — had many missteps that enabled the poor infrastructure that caused the oil well failure and ensuing catastrophe. Further, the oil industry regularly causes these types of incidents in other, less modernized parts of the world frequently!

Protests against the Obama Administration’s questionable relationship with BP and shoddy first five weeks of Deep Horizon oversight have yielded results. Witness President Obama’s remarks on Friday: “”What I don’t want to hear is, when they’re spending that kind of money on their shareholders and spending that kind of money on TV advertising, that they’re nickel and diming fishermen or small business owners here in the Gulf who are having a hard time.” As BP’s behavior and PR machine demonstrates, this oversight will continue to be needed, and that means citizens need to keep the pressure on both BP and the Obama Administration.

From a governmental reform standpoint, protesting further off shore drilling helps the environment. Demanding that elected officials run clean campaigns that disclose or eliminate corporate funding — effectively getting special interests like the oil lobby out of government — helps. Writing Senators to ask for a progressive clean energy oriented Climate Bill helps.

From an action standpoint, there have been a variety of organizations that have assembled volunteer efforts, from their action from afar via computer to on-site action. Here are three articles to consider:

Whatever you decide to do, please be mindful. Remember Gandhi’s lessons. Ask yourself does it help the Gulf and those affected? Does it improve the government or industry so it doesn’t happen again? Will it help the environment?

Also see Jennifer Windrum’s How You Can Truly Help the Gulf Now.

Popularity: 3% [?]

We Just Can’t Live Like This Anymore

Posted on: May 31st, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 5 Comments

The Flag Still Flies Over Pearl Harbor

As we assess the very real economic damage and fathom the full scope of the environmental catastrophe caused by the Deep Horizon crisis, it’s natural to feel great anger, despair and even depression. Yet this suffering can provide our society the motivation to resolve the larger issues that caused the oil spill.

We don’t have to sit in front of our screens and do nothing. Instead, we can act. For me there’s no other choice. We can’t keep living like this anymore. Once we are aware, we become mindful about our actions, and how we enable these great problems.

It begins with compassion for what we have been, where we are now, and what we could be again. To achieve a better sustainable society, in my mind, there are three systematic issues that need to be addressed: The environmental matter, the special interest/government problem, and frankly, ethics in public relations.

Environmental Impact

The time for scoffing at alarmed “tree-hugging” environmentalists must come to an end. If there’s anything that Deep Horizon demonstrates, it’s the real damage that unchecked industry can wreak upon our world.

While major catastrophes like this force our attention to finally consider fisheries, marine life, and general environmental malaise, it’s individual acts of mindful conservation that will change the tide. The reality is that the United States consumes more than 1/5 of the world’s resources. There is much we can change in our day-to-day lives.

On a national level, the recently introduced Climate Bill has provisions about our future energy development, including the enablement of further off shore drilling. It’s critical that we use Deep Horizon as a motivator to write our Congressmen and Senators. Please tell them 1) there is no room for additional off shore drilling in U.S. waters and 2) that we need a real long-term road-map for sustainable energy resources, not coal and oil.

We — you, me, all of us — have been subsidizing — paying — Big Oil in all kinds of ways, hidden and not so hidden, to do exactly what Exxon and BP have done and will continue to do if we don’t demand change. Consider the billions of dollars these companies receive in tax breaks, and then their incredible profits and executive salaries. This money must be redirected toward clean energy. Our children deserve no less.

Special Interests and Government

There’s been a great trail of corporate wreckage over the past decade, including BP; the health care industry; Halliburton, Blackwater/Xe and Iraq; the financial mortgage meltdown (AIG, Goldman Sachs, etc.); Toyota, Monsanto, Citizens United decision; general lobbying against measures to address climate change; and the net neutrality war to name a few. And there has been a lot of hub bub about a new generation of government under this Administration.

The incredible power that special interests hold over our government has absolutely stifled our ability to function as a society. This problem extends beyond partisanship to include both the Democrat and the Republican alike as demonstrated by the Deep Horizon incident. In fact as the Supreme Court demonstrated with its Citizens United decision (the court ruled that companies were people, overturning the ban on independent expenditures by corporations, paving the way for unlimited corporate and union spending in elections), the problem is systemic.

Until we stop treating companies like citizens and take big money out of politics, the frequency of major corporate abuses will only increase. The best way for any of us to act today is to write our state and federal officials and demand that they support Clean Elections bills. We need to get corporate dollars out of our elected politicians’ campaigns as well as end high dollar lobbying incidents. Remember, these guys won’t get rid of the cash cow without pressure from us.

There are also more than 50 nonprofit organizations working on reforming the government right now. Support one of them (full disclosure: Common Cause is a client of mine).

Ethics in PR

Facebook Semantic Ad Failure Featuring @bp_america and @johnbell

This has been a long standing issue. It’s been one that I now often avoid rather than continue to fight, but, again, we just cannot live like this anymore. PRSA and other organizations have been fighting for a long time to install best practices. Yet we still have this problem.

The outrage from Deep Horizon was made exponentially worse by the bad PR from BP executives and the Obama Administration. People feel manipulated and lied to… And rightly so. Factual integrity is essential in a crisis, and frankly in any form of communications. Whether it’s posturing for stock price, liability or public opinion points, the common good and ethics have been sacrificed repeatedly during the Deep Horizon crisis. But Deep Horizon is just an example of the larger communications industry’s issues with ethics.

I think the media and bloggers are already all over this particular incident, but how do we raise the professional bar in general so it doesn’t occur with this kind of frequency?

Next Steps and Taking Action

Tomorrow’s 9 a.m. EDT “The El Show” podcast with Richard Laermer, special guest Rich Becker and I will focus on the PR ethics question as well as the BP Deep Horizon issue, in general. Wednesday’s Live Earth post will be a list of ways you can help Gulf Coast residents online. And lastly, I am working on a Mashable post focusing on how people are using social media to create grassroots efforts to clean up the oil spill.

In the interim, check out this Huffington Post article providing details on several different efforts, or donate to the National Wildlife Federation’s campaign to Help Wildlife Impacted by the BP Oil Spill (also my birthday campaign).

P.S. The flag photo in the post was taken at the U.S.S. Arizona memorial in Pearl Harbor. It’s a stark scene, reminding us of the great battle that ensued there almost 70 years ago, and the great price our armed forces have paid for freedom. I do want to acknowledge our veterans today — including my grandfathers — and thank them for their service.

Barbara Newell contributed to this post.

Popularity: 7% [?]

Authenticity in Corporate Social Responsibility

Posted on: February 18th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 48 Comments

Pepsi Cola

Social media continues to impact businesses and nonprofits in unforeseen ways. Perhaps the greatest trend of the moment is the fusion of corporate and philanthropic interests, which in turn is producing growing pains and change. It’s likely that the requirements of online transparency will demand a new era of authenticity in corporate community investment efforts.

This trend results from demands for better corporate citizenship and community participation, transparency digressions, and frankly, very public cause marketing and corporate social responsibility programs that have exposed weaknesses in the social media realms.

It’s a problem that keeps coming up, and won’t go away. This will force organizations and companies to become much more mindful about how they invest in their communities.

This discussion is one that I’ve been having piecemeal with many people, in and outside of Zoetica, from cohorts Kami Huyse and Beth Kanter to change-minded folks like Alex Bornkessel, Allyson Kapin, Dan Morrison and Amy Sample Ward. I want to thank each of them for our ongoing dialogue, and directly or indirectly helping synthesize this post. My purpose in publishing this is soliciting feedback to evolve this authenticity theory. Please sound off.

The Current Authenticity Situation

DC Central Kitchen - Indique Heights Teaches

Indique Heights Owner and Chef K.N. Vinod Teaches at DC Central Kitchen

Many companies blur the lines now between cause marketing and corporate social responsibility, which in turn creates problems. One is not the other, but unfortunately, the current business environment will likely continue blurring the definitions rather than adhering to form. In that sense, this reminds me of the personal brand vs. reputation debate.

Ninety percent of companies cannot discern the difference between cause marketing and corporate social responsibility. Altruism often fails or is not thought out. In reality, most companies think, “Yeah, we’ll give some money to charity,” and let their executives figure out which ones. In the social media world, now they just outsource it to their communities (in both good and bad ways).

We must accept this level of understanding and approach CSR/cause marketing in a manner that raises the general level of ethics at play. In either case, social media continues exposing weaknesses in cause marketing, which will force such initiatives to become more CSR-oriented.

Moving forward, regardless of purpose, companies need to become much more authentic in their community investments. Authenticity means instead of simply throwing money at a cause or contest, they would directly address their missions, or the problems directly/indirectly created by their business. A third category — family — would be the causes that impact their employees, such as healthcare.

By being much more mindful in their cause initiatives, companies become better community citizens. And frankly, their online communities of interest will start demanding it.

Three Forms of Authenticity in Community Investment

Authenticity in Corporate Social Responsibility

Mindful authenticity in corporate community investment manifests itself in three ways:

Mission: Every company tries to market something. In doing so they have a mission and a product or service that fulfills a need. As such, authenticity dictates that the company invest in a community in a manner that relates to their core competency and also their marketing initiatives.

This is much more important for cause marketing initiatives. For example, if a company’s mission is information technology oriented, then literacy and education are obvious investments. So is poverty, and ensuring that the digital divide gets conquered. But investing everything the company had in cancer research makes no sense as an IT company’s strategic investment. It would for a healthcare oriented company.

Problem: In life we all create wreckage, both directly and indirectly. Some do less, some do more. In the environmental sense, every person has a carbon footprint. Thus it’s safe to say every company impacts the community in some negative ways.

Authenticity here dictates acknowledgment of impact, and actions to address the damage. For example, Exxon Mobile may want to make a greater investment in green energy than a trifle $100 million investment. Or instead of allocating $20 million for Pepsi Refresh, Pepsi would take a few million dollars to support causes addressing obesity issues as well as investing in reusable container technologies.

Family: Right now I would classify 90 percent of corporate community investments in this category, and that’s a mistake. Many of the crowd-sourced contest initiatives go wayward in this sense, too… Why? Because most of the investments are not thought-out and represent haphazard donations. They don’t acknowledge the corporate mission or the problems the company creates.

That being said, we all have or are employees. Companies represent big families, and in that sense it’s right to take a portion of donatable funds, and invest in real human issues like autism research or homelessness.

The right formula of mission, problem and family needs to be weighed intelligently by each organization. But that’s where the growth comes. Because blindly investing in family causes, or solely focusing on mission based initiatives causes an organization to stray from its community. Given today’s social media environment, at some point a cry will come for more balanced investment approaches.

What do you think about authenticity in corporate social responsibility?

Popularity: 40% [?]

The Ecological Crisis Creates More Homeless People

Posted on: February 10th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston No Comments

Church in the Mirror
I saw this homeless man in Montreal, Canada last summer. He was enjoying the shade!

The invisible face of the homeless comes from many places, job losses and economic hardship to mental issues and alcohol/drug addiction. But there’s a new cause rising, that of climate change.

According to the International Organization for Migration, 20 million people were made homeless last year as a result of sudden-onset environmental disasters. From more frequent and stronger hurricanes to rising sea levels, even the most secure people are threatened. In the next 40 years, this number could rise to a total of one billion people.

Just today an astounding 3.1 percent of the world (again the IOM) is in a migratory state. The extent of homelessness just shocks me.

How can we continue to justify our excessive use of resources, from food and materials to energy and fuel while turning a blind eye to homelessness? Further, isn’t worse knowing that this consumption — which causes climate change — is actually worsening the problem? The interconnectedness of our societal problems amazes me.

Mark Horvath talks about the invisible faces of the homeless, the people we consciously pass on the streets without helping. We don’t want the difficulty of trying to change their plights… It would simply be easier to tune them out, mindlessly engaged in our iPhones or daily difficulties. That’s a shame because they are real people.

I’ve had various brushes with homelessness in my life. When I lost a job in the dot com bubble on ’99, I ended up moving back to DC with the shirt on my back and the computer in the trunk. I lived in a friends basement for two months until found a job. I was lucky the situation didn’t devolve causing me to live on the street, but it was through the grace of friends and family that I made it. Believe me, I was afraid for the worst.

Great Smile!

More recently, I’ve had the great fortune of doing some work and fundraising for DC Central Kitchen. The Kitchen does a wonderful job providing training and opportunities for the city’s homeless. Working for a day with these people you see how wonderful they are, their smiles and their new found lives. It reminds me that no matter what there remains hope.

I’ve also cooked for the homeless at Miriam’s Kitchen. And that my friends was so sad. It was early in the morning, and you can feel the anger and the hurt of the homeless as they waited outside for their food. Pain penetrated the air.

Writing this as I wait out yet another major snow storm — an unprecedented third major storm for one winter (hello, climate change) — I have to wonder how the city’s citizens, the ones who are forced to live on the street will do. And then there are those who may become homeless because of this ongoing winter crisis. Isn’t it time to stop and really pay attention to this problem?

Geoff Livingston is a regular contributor to the Live Earth blog.

Popularity: 19% [?]

Social Zen

Posted on: February 6th, 2010 by Geoff Livingston 3 Comments

One of the more interesting aspects of the social web lies in its ability to enable ideas to be spread further throughout society. Movements really catch fire when people identify with an idea and spread it further. Thus ideas need to be attractive, rather than promoted. Zen Buddhism — a spiritual ethic that attracts its practitioners rather than seeking growth through promotion — proliferates the social web.

And like other online movements, social Zen (and other forms of buddhism) seems to be characterized by those who have embraced the concept, but have morphed into their own expression. Consider the widely read Zen Habits blog, YouTube videos, these collected Zen CSS templates, Zen iPhone apps, Zenish social networks, etc.

Everything’s Zen!

There does exist concern in the formal Zen community that pop Zen will dilute the faith. Hipsters wearing new leather jackets, eating meat at every meal, checking their cell phones in the middle every activity, and generally walking around without any formal knowledge of mindfulness, etc., often represent the antithesis of Zen teachings.

3963222203_76f6d8aa63.jpg

One can even buy Zen tea now in most parts of the country (image by Robert Donovan)

But one cannot argue that the proliferation of the Zen ethos into west has had a positive impact, from personal life in the moment reflections to business approaches. Further, some forms of the Buddhist tradition — including Zen — have traditionally morphed to meet its residential culture’s needs. Thus the rise of people like Phil Jackson who identify themselves as both Zen and Christian. With the demands of the urgent needs of day-to-day digital life, an undercurrent of Buddhism has arisen within the social web and mainstream life to bring back a meditative, purposeful reflection on life.

Online movements are generated by people and communities, though some corporations and governments have certainly started to figure out how the social web works. And similarly Buddhist monasteries have found their way to the social web, too. In many ways this fascinates me, not only on a personal level, but also as someone who helps nonprofits and mindful companies understand social media.

Consider the Dalai Lama’s impressive Facebook page. The Dalai Lama’s form of Buddhism -Vajrayana – is a different route to enlightenment than Zen, which is a school of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Yet arguably his presence has made the greatest strides in branching the formal teachings of Buddhism to the west on the social web.

Blog Training at New Hamlet

On the Mahayana Zen side, one of the most well known teachers is Nobel Peace Prize-nominated Thich Nhat Hanh, from whom I’ve had the great pleasure of learning (above photo shows me providing blog training at Nhat Hanh’s Plum Village). Nhat Hanh’s sangha has built out a Facebook and Twitter presence as well. The sangha has used blogs and Care2′s petition site for activism as well.

Theravada Buddhism also pervades the social web with discussions and blogs. Unlike the other two major Buddhist vehicles, Theravada training has traditionally been limited to monastic life. It will be interesting to see if social media enables transmission of the Theravada ethic to laypeople.

Popularity: 23% [?]