Archive for the ‘Zoetica’ Category

PayPal Research Shows Strength of Community Trumps Popularity

Posted on: November 3rd, 2011 by Geoff Livingston 3 Comments

Paddyobrien

We live in strange times in which an online following is considered the mark of success. This era of weblebrity seems caustic at times with companies, nonprofits and individuals chasing personal brands for their time. Yet, as we dig deeper we see that real influence online does not necessarily tether itself to the most well known, rather the most engaged. Some research released today, The Effectiveness of Celebrity Spokespeople in Social Fundraisers, conducted on case studies within the PayPal network validates this truth.

The paper, my final as a Zoetican and co-authored with Henry T. Dunbar, concludes that online celebrity fundraising efforts are hit and miss. Further some of the biggest names get outpaced by lesser known web-based personalities or weblebrities who activate deep ties to their communities.

The research shows over and over again that the hyper-engaged online personality with an authentic story is the one to succeed. Here are some examples:

  • A campaign on Facebook’s Causes to raise money for a new children’s hospital. In it, a 9-year-old cancer patient with virtually no online presence generated more donations than any other individual, including television star Ashton Kutcher.
  • A DonorsChoose.org fundraising competition among bloggers —- including TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington and All Things D’s Kara Swisher —- was dominated by a blogger offering to parade around in a tomato suit.
  • The launch competition of Kevin Bacon’s Six Degrees social giving website: Despite recruiting more than 60 celebrities to create “charity badges” on the site —- including Nicole Kidman and Ashley Judd -— the top fundraiser was a woman who blogs about scrapbooking and has an autistic son.
  • The PayPal-sponsored Regift the Fruitcake campaign on Facebook was won by Operation Smile with the help of Filipina singer Charice and her engaged fans. Other more notable celebrities participated, but didn’t deliver Charice’s impact.
  • TwitChange, which hosts charity auctions where fans buy mentions, follows, and retweets from celebrities on Twitter. Through three auctions in 2010, two of the celebrities drawing the most attention and highest bids have been actor Zachary Levi (of TV’s Chuck) and celebrity photographer Jeremy Cowart, beating stars such as country singer LeAnn Rimes and celebrity gossip blogger Perez Hilton.

As practitioners and communicators, we owe it to ourselves and our clients to dig deeper, and learn the underpinnings of the online social web. Real influence is more than popularity, and this paper goes a great distance to highlighting the important components of authenticity, real strong community engagement, and a willingness to actively work with a community to affect change.

The whole paper is online, and embedded below. Over the next few weeks, expect to see several full case studies outlining the principles of the paper published here. Special thanks to PayPal’s Clam Lorenz, Network for Good’s Katya Andresen, DonorsChoose.org’s Anna Doherty, Operation Smile’s Kristi Kastrounis, and TwitChange’s Shaun King, all of whom provided the outstanding content and insights that made this paper possible.

Effectiveness of Celebrity Spokespeople in Social Fundraisers

Popularity: 1% [?]

Fare Well, Zoeticans

Posted on: October 20th, 2011 by Geoff Livingston 35 Comments

Beth Kanter (@kanter), Geoff Livingston (@geoffliving) & Kami Huyse (@kamichat)

Floods are incredible things. They do more than just financially damage your house, they can change your life course. And so it was with me and Zoetica.

A plan to become an autonomous consultant under the Zoetica brand turned into a hasty departure in late September. The company was migrating into autonomous consultancies after an effort to scale for a year and a half. The immediate exit was taken to liquidate my ownership to help finance recovery from the continuing flood damage.

I would publicly like to thank my business partners Kami Huyse and Beth Kanter for facilitating this exit in a rapid fashion. Thank you for the great projects and experiences that we had together, from the American Red Cross and the Case Foundation to Google and the National 4-H Council, and many other worthy clients, too many to name here.

And I wish you both well with your continuing efforts under the Zoetica brand, and independently with the Packard Foundation. We still have one more dance, though, and I look forward to releasing our final client report together (assuming approvals within the client).

For me, the next few months will be focused on Give to the Max Day: Greater Washington, and analyzing its best practices and lessons learned in a Case Foundation research report. And, oh yeah, there’s this book thing. Much to do.

Again, thank you, Kami and Beth.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Contest: Does Social Strategy Need Content?

Posted on: July 14th, 2011 by Geoff Livingston 2 Comments

C.C. Chapman and Ann Handley

C.C. and Ann, image by John Wall

It’s time for another Zoetica book contest! This time we are giving away five copies of Ann Handley and C.C. Chapman‘s Content Rules to the person who best answers a question posed by Ann, “Can you have a social media strategy without a content strategy?” To answer and win, please comment on the Zoetica site. As with prior contests, to get the conversation started Kami, Julie and yours truly will also endeavor to answer Ann’s question.

The short answer is no, you do not need content to have a social strategy. This assumes a conservative definition of content: The intentional creation of writing, video, imagery and/or audio that is produced for a social community. If you include conversations then yes, you must have content as part of your social strategy.

That doesn’t necessarily mean a social strategy without content is smart. There are different factors that may make an organization lean that way, mostly time and resource capacity issues as well as rigid cultures and governmental regulation. The following two sections demonstrate different social approaches that don’t necessarily include that conservative definition of content, and why content makes them better.

Other Approaches to Social

Chess Board
Image by Sam Howzit

In Welcome to the Fifth Estate, four types approaches or strategies towards social media are outlined. Content is the second approach discussed. An excerpt of the book ran in PR News this May, which highlighted the other three strategies:

1) Participation: This may refer to an individual (often called a social media or community manager) or, in more sophisticated organizations, a team of people whose job is to have conversations with their communities of interest. The primary purposes of their activity are interaction, building trust and developing relationships. Most customer service accounts on Twitter fall into this category.

Participation also is a precursor for success in the other three primary areas of social media strategy. In many ways it’s a two-step of listening and responding—basic, functional and necessary for any kind of dance, and utilitarian enough that you can get away with it for one night.

One of the best examples of an organization that fosters participation is the nonprofit Social Media Club. It’s no coincidence that co-founder Chris Heuer is one of the original proponents of participation marketing on the social Web. Social Media Club began in 2006 with meetings in San Francisco. Now more than 200 chapters exist around the globe to host conversations on and offline that explore key societal issues raised by transformative social technologies.

3) Top-Down: Many organizations assume they will not be able to invest the time in the grassroots effort necessary for full community participation, nor do they want to commit to a long-term content offering. Instead, they opt to build relationships with influencers, people that the larger community trusts and responds to, from bloggers to active social network participants. They seek blog coverage or social network profile endorsements using a relevant offering to the influencer. By building relationships with influencers, they hope the communities that follow those leading voices will follow suit.

The Gap engaged in an outreach program before the 2010 BlogHer conference, offering 100 influential female bloggers a $400 shopping allowance and a styling appointment at a local Gap. These women were described as influencers and speakers at a conference where Gap clothes would be seen by hundreds of other women. Many speakers tweeted using a #gapmagic hashtag and blogged about their experience, and most wore their new Gap clothes during the conference.

4) Empowerment: The hardest of all forms of social media strategy, empowerment assumes that the organization will commit to building a far-flung community. The empowered Fifth Estate members create conversations and ideas that are so extensive they exist well beyond the organization’s reach. Instead, the company or nonprofit becomes much more of a host and facilitator, available when called upon. The organization then creates initiatives and helps to sustain the effort over the long term. Crowdsourcing—including large-scale multi-city events, cause-based initiatives and far-flung internal organizational communities—is the most common example of the empowerment strategy.

Consider 350’s efforts with this type of strategy. The nonprofit organizes an annual global day of environmental action to reduce carbon dioxide omissions. It uses social tools to help local organizers develop their own events, to promote the events and to keep their stakeholders informed. In 2010, 350 organized 10/10/10 Work Parties to get people focused on actions, signing up more than 7,000 event organizers in 180 countries.

Why Content Makes Social Better

Chocolate Bark
Image by Rositata

Just because you can go online and achieve results without creating content, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t. There are so many benefits to content in its own right, which Ann and C.C. make clear in their excellent book (see Beth Kanter’s review).

Beyond that it makes all of the other strategies easier. Sometimes content can serve as air cover, supporting initiatives like blogger relations with great conversation starters, links, round-ups, and counterpoints.

In the case of participation, if you are in tune with a community, what better way to serve its informational needs than with great content? This is like the old two-step. In a conversation with Klout CEO Joe Fernandez he mentioned almost anyone on his network with scores of 70 or higher is a content producer. Not that Klout scores are a good metric, but it just goes to show you, content sparks conversations.

On the crowdsourcing side, there are many outcomes that don’t involve content such as votes, new intellectual property and events like 350′s, but content helps support support these initiatives. How-tos, highlighting community member successes, etc. are examples of smart community management. Further, a good portion of crowdsourcing efforts seek user generated content in its own right.

Yes, it can be tough to produce content, but there are methods for making it easier (also covered in Content Rules). And in tandem with other approaches, content makes for a much more comprehensive, strong social strategy.

So what do you think? Can you have a social media strategy without a content strategy? To answer and win your copy of Content Rules, please comment on the Zoetica site.

This post was added to the Fifth Estate Strategy wiki.

Popularity: 1% [?]