<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Geoff Livingston&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geofflivingston.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geofflivingston.com</link>
	<description>Musing on just about any topic, including online media, causes, green and life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:37:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Four Primary Types of Social Media Strategy by Daulton West, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://geofflivingston.com/2010/09/01/the-four-primary-types-of-social-media-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-31644</link>
		<dc:creator>Daulton West, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geofflivingston.com/?p=1707#comment-31644</guid>
		<description>Geoff,
You have researched and know your subject well. Your article offers great insight as to why companies and individuals, depending on what their goals are, engage in social media for different reasons.

I liked your observation, &quot;there’s a fine line between serving and spamming&quot;, and have shared a similar view with my connections. 

No matter what the reason for engaging in social media, a good “best practice” guideline worth remembering is, “it&#039;s about building relationships, and offering something of value - not shameless self-promotion.”

Thanks Geoff - for defining the categories and a framework for understanding the reasons that organizations choose to leverage social media. 

I have added your blog as a favorite and will share it with my followers. 

- @DWestJr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff,<br />
You have researched and know your subject well. Your article offers great insight as to why companies and individuals, depending on what their goals are, engage in social media for different reasons.</p>
<p>I liked your observation, &#8220;there’s a fine line between serving and spamming&#8221;, and have shared a similar view with my connections. </p>
<p>No matter what the reason for engaging in social media, a good “best practice” guideline worth remembering is, “it&#8217;s about building relationships, and offering something of value &#8211; not shameless self-promotion.”</p>
<p>Thanks Geoff &#8211; for defining the categories and a framework for understanding the reasons that organizations choose to leverage social media. </p>
<p>I have added your blog as a favorite and will share it with my followers. </p>
<p>- @DWestJr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Four Primary Types of Social Media Strategy by Proud to Be Simple &#124; Geoff Livingston&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://geofflivingston.com/2010/09/01/the-four-primary-types-of-social-media-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-31608</link>
		<dc:creator>Proud to Be Simple &#124; Geoff Livingston&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geofflivingston.com/?p=1707#comment-31608</guid>
		<description>[...] post on the four types social media strategy sparked a great Facebook debate about what is strategy. Some said social media is not a strategy, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post on the four types social media strategy sparked a great Facebook debate about what is strategy. Some said social media is not a strategy, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mindfulness the Key to Finding Female Speakers by Geoff Livingston</title>
		<link>http://geofflivingston.com/2010/09/01/mindfulness-the-key-to-finding-female-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-31592</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Livingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geofflivingston.com/?p=1714#comment-31592</guid>
		<description>@Bonnie So long as you don&#039;t call me a boy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bonnie So long as you don&#8217;t call me a boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mindfulness the Key to Finding Female Speakers by Chuck Hall</title>
		<link>http://geofflivingston.com/2010/09/01/mindfulness-the-key-to-finding-female-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-31591</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geofflivingston.com/?p=1714#comment-31591</guid>
		<description>Great perspective, Geoff. I am a white male who appreciates diversity in conference presentations. I recently emailed organizers of a conference I was interested in attending to express my concerns. Of the 15 speakers, 14 are men. Twelve are white men. While the topics sound great I am sure the program would be better with greater diversity.

I am voting with my feet and not attending the conference. Perhaps if more of us take this approach event organizers will notice. Maybe not. But at least my time and energy will not contribute to such events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great perspective, Geoff. I am a white male who appreciates diversity in conference presentations. I recently emailed organizers of a conference I was interested in attending to express my concerns. Of the 15 speakers, 14 are men. Twelve are white men. While the topics sound great I am sure the program would be better with greater diversity.</p>
<p>I am voting with my feet and not attending the conference. Perhaps if more of us take this approach event organizers will notice. Maybe not. But at least my time and energy will not contribute to such events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mindfulness the Key to Finding Female Speakers by Bonnie Harris</title>
		<link>http://geofflivingston.com/2010/09/01/mindfulness-the-key-to-finding-female-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-31589</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geofflivingston.com/?p=1714#comment-31589</guid>
		<description>&quot;fantastic lady speakers?&quot; I&#039;m going to start calling the guys at conferences &quot;wonderful gentleman speakers&quot; from now on LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;fantastic lady speakers?&#8221; I&#8217;m going to start calling the guys at conferences &#8220;wonderful gentleman speakers&#8221; from now on LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mindfulness the Key to Finding Female Speakers by Andrea Learned</title>
		<link>http://geofflivingston.com/2010/09/01/mindfulness-the-key-to-finding-female-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-31588</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Learned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geofflivingston.com/?p=1714#comment-31588</guid>
		<description>I agree with Liz on this, and also realize there&#039;s an unconscious system in organizing events, as you point out, Geoff.  When conversations like this are started (and - it would be great if a few more men could chime in here!), I always think of that Boston Symphony gender-blind auditions case study. http://www.princeton.edu/pr/pwb/01/0212/7b.shtml If a person&#039;s speaking profile, video sample, tone/style etc...could all be non-gendered and organizers had to pick from a generic list of Speakers A-Z, for example, how might it naturally sort out?  The best men and women would rise up, I suspect. 

Perhaps, like everything else, those few conference organizer types who are aware of this will have to make a point of writing articles/posts about just how great their event&#039;s mixes of men and women speakers were!  This is one of those things I&#039;m not sure we&#039;ll see get that much better in our lifetimes, but we can start to nudge the needle for future generations of business speakers and audiences.

Thanks for taking time to start the conversation, Geoff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Liz on this, and also realize there&#8217;s an unconscious system in organizing events, as you point out, Geoff.  When conversations like this are started (and &#8211; it would be great if a few more men could chime in here!), I always think of that Boston Symphony gender-blind auditions case study. <a href="http://www.princeton.edu/pr/pwb/01/0212/7b.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.princeton.edu/pr/pwb/01/0212/7b.shtml</a> If a person&#8217;s speaking profile, video sample, tone/style etc&#8230;could all be non-gendered and organizers had to pick from a generic list of Speakers A-Z, for example, how might it naturally sort out?  The best men and women would rise up, I suspect. </p>
<p>Perhaps, like everything else, those few conference organizer types who are aware of this will have to make a point of writing articles/posts about just how great their event&#8217;s mixes of men and women speakers were!  This is one of those things I&#8217;m not sure we&#8217;ll see get that much better in our lifetimes, but we can start to nudge the needle for future generations of business speakers and audiences.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking time to start the conversation, Geoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mindfulness the Key to Finding Female Speakers by Liz Scherer</title>
		<link>http://geofflivingston.com/2010/09/01/mindfulness-the-key-to-finding-female-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-31584</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Scherer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geofflivingston.com/?p=1714#comment-31584</guid>
		<description>Interesting comment on the two things that need to happen, especially number two. I&#039;d like to see women doing all three - as they say, three&#039;s a charm.  And this, coming from a woman who abhors the game!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comment on the two things that need to happen, especially number two. I&#8217;d like to see women doing all three &#8211; as they say, three&#8217;s a charm.  And this, coming from a woman who abhors the game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mindfulness the Key to Finding Female Speakers by Geoff Livingston</title>
		<link>http://geofflivingston.com/2010/09/01/mindfulness-the-key-to-finding-female-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-31566</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Livingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geofflivingston.com/?p=1714#comment-31566</guid>
		<description>Interesting themes developing. Some observations.

Liz: I think you hit the nail on the ideal. But notice that not one man has commented, and only one man commented on the Facebook thread and none on Twitter. That tells me this issue is well entrenched in gender, and that men do not support women speaking (generally). So, I argue that until it&#039;s a natural act, we would need to make female speakers an act of mindful intent. That being said, I&#039;d rather see the argument framed as women joining men on stage in their rightful place rather than a battle of the genders.

Maggie, Jen, KD, Kami: I also do not solicit speaking opps, except when I have a burning need. I solicited opps when I was first launching Now Is Gone.  Now I get asked all the time, and choose, which is a fortunate place to be. That being said I prefer the idea that great speakers attract opportunities rather than solicit them. Attraction vs. promotion is always more powerful in marketing and in life. 

Yet the male speaking system seems to be built of promotion and proverbial chevrons on your sleeve.  In my opinion, two things need to happen:

1) Conference organizers need to acknowledge how the unconscious system works, awaken, and mindfully choose another way.
2) Women who desire to speak need to acknowledge the unconscious system, and start either 1) building new systems with their own events, 2) publicly criticizing events that uphold the old way, and/or 3) start soliciting opps and play the game.

A combination of these acts by organizers and female speakers would make great progress if approached with a will towards results, and organized as a movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting themes developing. Some observations.</p>
<p>Liz: I think you hit the nail on the ideal. But notice that not one man has commented, and only one man commented on the Facebook thread and none on Twitter. That tells me this issue is well entrenched in gender, and that men do not support women speaking (generally). So, I argue that until it&#8217;s a natural act, we would need to make female speakers an act of mindful intent. That being said, I&#8217;d rather see the argument framed as women joining men on stage in their rightful place rather than a battle of the genders.</p>
<p>Maggie, Jen, KD, Kami: I also do not solicit speaking opps, except when I have a burning need. I solicited opps when I was first launching Now Is Gone.  Now I get asked all the time, and choose, which is a fortunate place to be. That being said I prefer the idea that great speakers attract opportunities rather than solicit them. Attraction vs. promotion is always more powerful in marketing and in life. </p>
<p>Yet the male speaking system seems to be built of promotion and proverbial chevrons on your sleeve.  In my opinion, two things need to happen:</p>
<p>1) Conference organizers need to acknowledge how the unconscious system works, awaken, and mindfully choose another way.<br />
2) Women who desire to speak need to acknowledge the unconscious system, and start either 1) building new systems with their own events, 2) publicly criticizing events that uphold the old way, and/or 3) start soliciting opps and play the game.</p>
<p>A combination of these acts by organizers and female speakers would make great progress if approached with a will towards results, and organized as a movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mindfulness the Key to Finding Female Speakers by Liz Scherer</title>
		<link>http://geofflivingston.com/2010/09/01/mindfulness-the-key-to-finding-female-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-31561</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Scherer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geofflivingston.com/?p=1714#comment-31561</guid>
		<description>I have been thinking about this post since I saw it yesterday. And the first post that you are responding to. I wonder if part of the problem with gender inequity lies in the fact that many keep perpetuating that divide rather than viewing us as individuals with specific skill sets? You&#039;ve raised the bar by actively seeking female speakers and I commend and applaud and herald these efforts. However, I&#039;d like to see a time when it&#039;s not female versus male but the most qualified or engaging or critical. I&#039;m not sure if this is a utopian vision or not. But the claims about qualifications or lack thereof that seems to permeate the interwebz every time the gender issue surfaces does appear to be, as you aptly state, seem to be entrenched in victimization and comfort rather than reality. Thanks for the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been thinking about this post since I saw it yesterday. And the first post that you are responding to. I wonder if part of the problem with gender inequity lies in the fact that many keep perpetuating that divide rather than viewing us as individuals with specific skill sets? You&#8217;ve raised the bar by actively seeking female speakers and I commend and applaud and herald these efforts. However, I&#8217;d like to see a time when it&#8217;s not female versus male but the most qualified or engaging or critical. I&#8217;m not sure if this is a utopian vision or not. But the claims about qualifications or lack thereof that seems to permeate the interwebz every time the gender issue surfaces does appear to be, as you aptly state, seem to be entrenched in victimization and comfort rather than reality. Thanks for the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mindfulness the Key to Finding Female Speakers by Kami Huyse</title>
		<link>http://geofflivingston.com/2010/09/01/mindfulness-the-key-to-finding-female-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-31553</link>
		<dc:creator>Kami Huyse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geofflivingston.com/?p=1714#comment-31553</guid>
		<description>Geoff;

You are right about pitching. I have never pitched myself for a conference except when there was an organized call for entries. I have been fortunate that I get asked fairly regularly, but I think women could use some training in how to approach this without sounding like one of the chest beaters you so disdain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff;</p>
<p>You are right about pitching. I have never pitched myself for a conference except when there was an organized call for entries. I have been fortunate that I get asked fairly regularly, but I think women could use some training in how to approach this without sounding like one of the chest beaters you so disdain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
