Posts Tagged ‘Fifth Estate’

Book Excerpt: The Death of Facebook

Posted on: July 23rd, 2011 by Geoff Livingston 1 Comment

PastedGraphic 1

The following is an excerpt from Welcome to the Fifth Estate, Chapter 7: Sustaining Your Community Over Time

Who in their right mind would predict the death of Facebook, given its ever-increasing dominance? But everyone always asks, “What’s next?”

One thing long-term Internet citizens have seen over the past 30 years: Communities and social networks get large, even as dominant as Facebook now is, and then they fade.

Some stay relevant as leaders in their niches — YouTube, for example — and others drop into a second tier, or worse. Friendster, MySpace and AOL exist in some form to this day, but none of them enjoys the leadership positions and mindshare of their heyday.

One of the secrets to Facebook’s longevity is its replication of the McDonald’s business model. McDonald’s offers a cheap menu of foods and beverages that contemporary society demands. If a customer wants a latte, they can go to McDonald’s. Ice cream? McDonald’s offers soft serve. Salad? No problem! And McDonald’s still offers the now classic Big Mac, just in case someone wants a burger.

Facebook does the same with its social network functionality. It literally watches competitors create new features, and then it incorporates those functionalities into its network, competing head-to-head in that functional space. Facebook relies on its incredibly large user base to accept and use the new features. We saw this with Facebook Places and the competition it offers Foursquare. Other examples include:

  • Facebook Pictures competes with Flickr
  • Facebook Video competes with YouTube (this feature does as well as a McRib sandwich on market share)
  • Facebook Chat competes with AOL’s AIM
  • Facebook Questions and Groups compete with LinkedIn Questions and Groups

One could argue that the strength of this business model is also Facebook’s weakness. As we have seen over time, Facebook constantly updates its interface to incorporate these changes. This is relatively easy because of its text-based, three-column layout. While text allows Facebook to offer all of these features, the user interface has become clunky and cumbersome. In essence, being the McDonald’s of social networks has forced it into an over-reliance on text.

If a competing technology arose that provided a new interface, an almost completely visual tactile (touch) input to a social application, then Facebook would be challenged to completely redesign its web site. Several new apps on iPad have shown a new way to interact. Early signs show these applications are becoming immensely popular.

One iPad application, Flipboard, allows users to create their own magazines based on preferences and socially recommended content. ABC’s popular iPad app features a visual globe of news stories. Both application interfaces rely heavily on pictures with very few words, and why shouldn’t they, given that a picture is worth a thousand words?

It’s only a question of time—maybe even within the next two years—before a primarily visual-interface-based social network launches. Processing time, software development and bandwidth inevitably will increase to enable it. How will Facebook upgrade its interface to compete with this kind of innovation?

It would take an almost complete gutting of its social networking code. Facebook’s system has become so clunky that Facebook CEO Marc Zuckerberg can’t make changes that he wants to in order to open the network.Plus Facebook’s original feature of private, closed social networking was its big differentiator. The privacy tension caused by the movement toward openness continues to haunt Facebook.

Such a network upgrade likely would force Facebook to abandon users who are still text-based. It would be very hard for McDonald’s to keep serving Big Macs while offering a tastier Filet Mignon sandwich that holds market share (Angus Wraps aside). If you think Facebook cannot unseated,or it will not be by a tactile-input-based network, what about a video- based network? Bandwidth and technology permitting, how about Third Life, a better version of Second Life’s would-be virtual-avatar-based world, where interaction would occur in a computer-generated 3-D environment? Or a video-based network like, but more nimble than, the original Seesmic?

Isn’t it just a question of time before Facebook meets a competitor with a better, next-generation interface that it can’t match? Yes given the context of Internet history and technology development.

If a better, easier choice becomes available, you can expect people to spend more time on it than on Facebook. The Fifth Estate moves with what’s hot, and without thinking about the historical value of today’s technology platform of choice.

Business leaders and strategists cannot afford to become too entrenched on a mega social network like Facebook or Twitter. If an organization cannot move with its community because of an over-investment in one network, it loses the opportunity to serve stakeholders effectively.

# # #


The source material for this section of the Fifth Estate was originally published on this blog under the same title.

Contest: Does Social Strategy Need Content?

Posted on: July 14th, 2011 by Geoff Livingston 2 Comments

C.C. Chapman and Ann Handley

C.C. and Ann, image by John Wall

It’s time for another Zoetica book contest! This time we are giving away five copies of Ann Handley and C.C. Chapman‘s Content Rules to the person who best answers a question posed by Ann, “Can you have a social media strategy without a content strategy?” To answer and win, please comment on the Zoetica site. As with prior contests, to get the conversation started Kami, Julie and yours truly will also endeavor to answer Ann’s question.

The short answer is no, you do not need content to have a social strategy. This assumes a conservative definition of content: The intentional creation of writing, video, imagery and/or audio that is produced for a social community. If you include conversations then yes, you must have content as part of your social strategy.

That doesn’t necessarily mean a social strategy without content is smart. There are different factors that may make an organization lean that way, mostly time and resource capacity issues as well as rigid cultures and governmental regulation. The following two sections demonstrate different social approaches that don’t necessarily include that conservative definition of content, and why content makes them better.

Other Approaches to Social

Chess Board
Image by Sam Howzit

In Welcome to the Fifth Estate, four types approaches or strategies towards social media are outlined. Content is the second approach discussed. An excerpt of the book ran in PR News this May, which highlighted the other three strategies:

1) Participation: This may refer to an individual (often called a social media or community manager) or, in more sophisticated organizations, a team of people whose job is to have conversations with their communities of interest. The primary purposes of their activity are interaction, building trust and developing relationships. Most customer service accounts on Twitter fall into this category.

Participation also is a precursor for success in the other three primary areas of social media strategy. In many ways it’s a two-step of listening and responding—basic, functional and necessary for any kind of dance, and utilitarian enough that you can get away with it for one night.

One of the best examples of an organization that fosters participation is the nonprofit Social Media Club. It’s no coincidence that co-founder Chris Heuer is one of the original proponents of participation marketing on the social Web. Social Media Club began in 2006 with meetings in San Francisco. Now more than 200 chapters exist around the globe to host conversations on and offline that explore key societal issues raised by transformative social technologies.

3) Top-Down: Many organizations assume they will not be able to invest the time in the grassroots effort necessary for full community participation, nor do they want to commit to a long-term content offering. Instead, they opt to build relationships with influencers, people that the larger community trusts and responds to, from bloggers to active social network participants. They seek blog coverage or social network profile endorsements using a relevant offering to the influencer. By building relationships with influencers, they hope the communities that follow those leading voices will follow suit.

The Gap engaged in an outreach program before the 2010 BlogHer conference, offering 100 influential female bloggers a $400 shopping allowance and a styling appointment at a local Gap. These women were described as influencers and speakers at a conference where Gap clothes would be seen by hundreds of other women. Many speakers tweeted using a #gapmagic hashtag and blogged about their experience, and most wore their new Gap clothes during the conference.

4) Empowerment: The hardest of all forms of social media strategy, empowerment assumes that the organization will commit to building a far-flung community. The empowered Fifth Estate members create conversations and ideas that are so extensive they exist well beyond the organization’s reach. Instead, the company or nonprofit becomes much more of a host and facilitator, available when called upon. The organization then creates initiatives and helps to sustain the effort over the long term. Crowdsourcing—including large-scale multi-city events, cause-based initiatives and far-flung internal organizational communities—is the most common example of the empowerment strategy.

Consider 350’s efforts with this type of strategy. The nonprofit organizes an annual global day of environmental action to reduce carbon dioxide omissions. It uses social tools to help local organizers develop their own events, to promote the events and to keep their stakeholders informed. In 2010, 350 organized 10/10/10 Work Parties to get people focused on actions, signing up more than 7,000 event organizers in 180 countries.

Why Content Makes Social Better

Chocolate Bark
Image by Rositata

Just because you can go online and achieve results without creating content, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t. There are so many benefits to content in its own right, which Ann and C.C. make clear in their excellent book (see Beth Kanter’s review).

Beyond that it makes all of the other strategies easier. Sometimes content can serve as air cover, supporting initiatives like blogger relations with great conversation starters, links, round-ups, and counterpoints.

In the case of participation, if you are in tune with a community, what better way to serve its informational needs than with great content? This is like the old two-step. In a conversation with Klout CEO Joe Fernandez he mentioned almost anyone on his network with scores of 70 or higher is a content producer. Not that Klout scores are a good metric, but it just goes to show you, content sparks conversations.

On the crowdsourcing side, there are many outcomes that don’t involve content such as votes, new intellectual property and events like 350′s, but content helps support support these initiatives. How-tos, highlighting community member successes, etc. are examples of smart community management. Further, a good portion of crowdsourcing efforts seek user generated content in its own right.

Yes, it can be tough to produce content, but there are methods for making it easier (also covered in Content Rules). And in tandem with other approaches, content makes for a much more comprehensive, strong social strategy.

So what do you think? Can you have a social media strategy without a content strategy? To answer and win your copy of Content Rules, please comment on the Zoetica site.

This post was added to the Fifth Estate Strategy wiki.

Building a Market for Citizen Journalists

Posted on: June 19th, 2011 by Geoff Livingston 10 Comments

إئتلاف الثورة السورية فرع قبرص - 20-05-2011 / CYPRUS
Image by Syrian Freedom

It was a great honor to feature some of the organizations that are trying to build a stronger citizen journalist corps last week on Mashable. One of the more striking aspects of the story interviews was a perceived need to build a receptive audience for citizen journalists. For example, both AllVoices and Global Voices are building platforms for new citizen voices.

In his interview for the piece, AllVoices GM Aki Hashmi said the biggest challenge facing citizen journalists was, “Being heard.” And as quoted in the Mashable piece Solana Larsen, managing editor of Global Voices, said, “Cultivating readership of citizen media is probably just as important as cultivating citizen media itself. People could be typing away in Egypt but if no one inside or outside the country were reading what they were saying or taking them seriously, it would have little effect.”

The need for a citizen journalist platform makes sense. If you think about it, most news organizations are not as progressive as CNN in highlighting citizen journalists (the iReports you see on the cable networks web site).

Instead, citizen journalists are left to compete with every other form of blogging and content creation on the social web. And there is significant competition from parent blogs to gamers.

Small World News Director and Cofounder Brian Conley stated as much in his interview for the story. “The biggest challenge for citizen journalists at the moment is to rise above the mass of citizen content and make themselves heard,” said Conley.

Citizen journalists are rarely looked for except when an event occurs. It is then — particularly in areas where the media is not present; has a relatively small foot print; or is simply not covering a story — that citizen journalism really shines. If you think about the most notable moments for citizen journalism, it has been when they break stories instead of the media. That is when independent voices become the Fifth Estate as first envisioned by media professor Stephen Cooper.

One thing is clear, even in its current limited role citizen journalism is working. As it matures, it might become more of a commonplace aspect of reporting the news. Reader demand for non-traditional masthead voices may increase.

Of course, that will take formal vetting by more journalist organizations to be included side by side with paid journalists. Having written a couple of iReports that made it to the front page of CNN’s site, the vetting process was significant with editors fact checking your report on the phone. Or new citizen journalism platforms like those mentioned here may simply become go to places for “on the scene” points of view.

What do you think about the future of citizen journalism?