Every Communicator Needs a Real Camera

A ton of data out shows the incredible impact visual media makes on engagement rates. There are many types of visual media marketers are using, from illustrations and graphics to video and photos.

Perhaps the easiest visual medium to grasp and use is photography. Unfortunately, there is a growing school of thought that with an iPhone or Nexus smartphone, a communicator is well equiped to meet the needs of the visual thirsty stakeholder.

Don’t kid yourself.

Every communicator needs a real camera.

Or a good photo site to research and license images from.

In spite of protests by media and pundits, marketers, entrepreneurs and artists alike would benefit from having access to a real camera and photographs. I would tell you use both a camera and a creative commons licensing site. It takes practice to learn how to take and edit photos. Having a resource to access others’ high quality photos is helpful.

The Chicago Experiment


Have doubts? Still think you can get away with pics on a smartphone?

The Chicago Sun-Times tried this experiment for you already when it fired its photography corps and armed them with iPhones. Fast forward a year, and the Sun-Times hired back four of the photojournalists, even after taining its staff on iPhone phtography and editing. Quality dropped dramatically.

While we are growing accustomed to user-generated photos, quality stands out. Personally, I can tell you that my Instagram photos taken with a DSLR and uploaded via smartphone fair about two to three times better on engagement than my regular old iPhone/Nexus shots (yes, I have both phones).

The value and engagement we see in Tenacity5’s projects like xPotomac and with clients like Vocus has convinced me. First of all, most people attending events don’t take quality photographs. We can better report on them, and provide attendees with a memory of their time.


Secondly, garnering equity from other events like SxSW and Social Media Marketing World requires reporting, networking and social sharing. There is no better way to do that than with photos taken live from an event. In doing so we provide extended access to the events through our communities.

If you are intimidated by a camera, there are plenty of free lessons available on these websites. Or take a class at your local art school. The most important aspects are to learn how to tell a story with a photograph and basic editing tips.

From there, the world is your oyster.

What do you think? Is quality photography a part of modern communications?

Originally posted on the Vocus blog.


  • Yes and no. As in everything; it depends. I have a client right now who is reticent to do any video because they think each one has to be highly produced. There is a time and place for spontaneous imagery and video footage via smartphone but more to your point, if you want to stand out, it’s important to invest in good equipment and talent. I have a good friend who is a professional photographer. The other day he joked how you can make HUNDREDS of dollars as a pro.
    We all think we can do it on our own, and sometimes we can. Sometimes, we absolutely should not.

    • I don’t know. Is it should not? Or won’t/don’t want to. I don’t think should not or can’t do is the right approach to anything in life. People said the same thing to me about writing, and I am quite happy that I ignored them.

  • If you show people the difference in quality I think it might help influence more of them to push to carry a camera along with them to important events.

  • Pingback:People Scream In Cyberspace But Nobody Listens - The JackB

    […] Geoff makes a case for why communicators need a real camera. I find it compelling for multiple reasons both personal and professional. […]

  • Pingback:A Bigger Problem than Content Shock | Geoff Livingston's Blog

    […] look at the performance my Nikon captured social photos versus the iPhone shots. This is why every communicator needs a camera, in my […]

Comments are closed